These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24397385)

  • 21. Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating.
    Cockerham CC; Weir BS
    Biometrics; 1984 Mar; 40(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 6733226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Paternity exclusion power: comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding.
    Pinto N; Gusmão L; Egeland T; Amorim A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Feb; 7(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 23312390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Definition and estimation of higher-order gene fixation indices.
    Ritland K
    Genetics; 1987 Dec; 117(4):783-93. PubMed ID: 3428575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A proximal decomposition of inbreeding, coancestry and contributions.
    Colleau JJ; Sargolzaei M
    Genet Res (Camb); 2008 Apr; 90(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 18426622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Restricting coancestry and inbreeding at a specific position on the genome by using optimized selection.
    Roughsedge T; Pong-Wong R; Woolliams JA; Villanueva B
    Genet Res (Camb); 2008 Apr; 90(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 18426623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimating levels of inbreeding using AFLP markers.
    Dasmahapatra KK; Lacy RC; Amos W
    Heredity (Edinb); 2008 Mar; 100(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 17987055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of additive and dominance effects in selected or unselected populations with inbreeding.
    de Boer IJ; van Arendonk JA
    Theor Appl Genet; 1992 Jul; 84(3-4):451-9. PubMed ID: 24203207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Theory of inbreeding and covariances between relatives under full-sib mating in diploids.
    Cornelius PL; Dudley JW
    Biometrics; 1975 Mar; 31(1):169-87. PubMed ID: 1164531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of biallelic markers and microsatellites for the estimation of population and conservation genetic parameters in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Ryynänen HJ; Tonteri A; Vasemägi A; Primmer CR
    J Hered; 2007; 98(7):692-704. PubMed ID: 17986472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of Molecular Pairwise Relatedness in Autopolyploid Crops.
    Amadeu RR; Lara LAC; Munoz P; Garcia AAF
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Dec; 10(12):4579-4589. PubMed ID: 33051262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Additive by additive variance with inbreeding and linkage.
    Cockerham CC
    Genetics; 1984 Oct; 108(2):487-500. PubMed ID: 6500259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dominance models with method R for stature of Holsteins.
    Misztal I; Lawlor TJ; Fernando RL
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 May; 80(5):975-8. PubMed ID: 9178138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A forensic DNA profiling system for Northern European brown bears (Ursus arctos).
    Andreassen R; Schregel J; Kopatz A; Tobiassen C; Knappskog PM; Hagen SB; Kleven O; Schneider M; Kojola I; Aspi J; Rykov A; Tirronen KF; Danilov PI; Eiken HG
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):798-809. PubMed ID: 22483764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.
    Chybicki IJ; Burczyk J
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18936113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What should we weigh to estimate heterozygosity, alleles or loci?
    Aparicio JM; Ortego J; Cordero PJ
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Dec; 15(14):4659-65. PubMed ID: 17107491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Demontis D; Pertoldi C; Loeschcke V; Mikkelsen K; Axelsson T; Kristensen TN
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Nov; 18(22):4551-63. PubMed ID: 19780974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?
    Rousset F
    Heredity (Edinb); 2002 May; 88(5):371-80. PubMed ID: 11986874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.