These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24398190)
1. Effect of a disposable automated suturing device on cost and operating room time in benign total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedures. Hart S; Hashemi L; Sobolewski CJ JSLS; 2013; 17(4):508-16. PubMed ID: 24398190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inpatient Hospital Costs and Route of Hysterectomy for Management of Benign Uterine Disease in the 90-Day Global Billing Period. Bauer HH; Sahmoud A; Rhodes SP; Sheyn D Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 144(2):266-274. PubMed ID: 38870524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia. Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection. Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost evaluation, quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Kularatna S; Herath R; Wijesinghe P Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):565. PubMed ID: 29178955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison. Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions. Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy. Dorsey JH; Holtz PM; Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Steinberg EP N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 8672153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer. Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Barnett JC; Judd JP; Wu JM; Scales CD; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 116(3):685-693. PubMed ID: 20733453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Newly Developed Laparoscopic Needle Holder That Facilitates Knot Tying Makes Vaginal Cuff Suturing Easy in Single-Port Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Biler A; Kale A; Terzi H; Solmaz U Surg Innov; 2017 Dec; 24(6):605-610. PubMed ID: 28933250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]