These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Learning curve analysis of intracorporeal cuff suturing during robotic single-site total hysterectomy. Akdemir A; Zeybek B; Ozgurel B; Oztekin MK; Sendag F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 24952342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights. Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in a community hospital. Redwine DB J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 May; 2(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 9050574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g. Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study. Ross S; Lier D; Mackinnon G; Bentz C; Rakowski G; Capstick VA BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e027099. PubMed ID: 31831528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. Beste TM; Nelson KH; Daucher JA JSLS; 2005; 9(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15791963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons. Klebanoff JS; Tyan P; Nishikawa M; North A; Amdur R; Sparks A; Kazma JM; Moawad GN J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 32253574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Paraiso MF; Ridgeway B; Park AJ; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Falcone T; Einarsson JI Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 208(5):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minilaparotomy vs. laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of length of hospital stay. Perron-Burdick M; Calhoun A; Idowu D; Pressman A; Zaritsky E J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 24469276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients. Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis. Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes. Pasic RP; Rizzo JA; Fang H; Ross S; Moore M; Gunnarsson C J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 20850391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series. Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]