These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24398190)
41. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy. Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of postoperative partial bladder filling after minimally invasive hysterectomy on postanesthesia care unit discharge and cost: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Moawad G; Tyan P; Marfori C; Abi Khalil E; Park D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):367.e1-367.e7. PubMed ID: 30639089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Replacement of expensive, disposable instruments with old-fashioned surgical techniques for improved cost-effectiveness in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Morrison JE; Jacobs VR JSLS; 2004; 8(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 15119671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications. Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications. AlAshqar A; Goktepe ME; Kilic GS; Borahay MA J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 50(2):101936. PubMed ID: 33039600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy. Saceanu S; Cela V; Surlin V; Angelescu CM; Patrascu S; Georgescu I; Genazzani A Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 23790783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications. Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Gotlieb WH; Abenhaim HA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):665.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26188114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Cost analysis]. Pittino M; Facchin S; Rossi A; Zompicchiatti C; Del Frate G; Zoletto M Minerva Ginecol; 1999; 51(7-8):277-81. PubMed ID: 10536422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy. Dandolu V; Pathak P Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs. Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reducing the cost of robotic hysterectomy: assessing the safety and efficacy of using prograsp forceps in lieu of needle holder for vaginal cuff closure. Rajanbabu A; Patel VJ; Appukuttan A J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 32266667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in a rural ambulatory surgery center. Morrison JE; Jacobs VR J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 Aug; 11(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 15559349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Abdominal Hysterectomy: Reduced Risk of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic and Laparoscopic Technique. Colling KP; Glover JK; Statz CA; Geller MA; Beilman GJ Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2015 Oct; 16(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 26070101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Senhance surgical system in benign hysterectomy: A real-world comparative assessment of case times and instrument costs versus da Vinci robotics and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy procedures. Coussons H; Feldstein J; McCarus S Int J Med Robot; 2021 Aug; 17(4):e2261. PubMed ID: 33860631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy. Dayaratna S; Goldberg J; Harrington C; Leiby BE; McNeil JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):120.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24060444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers. Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]