113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24398847)
1. Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
Choi HH; Chung CH; Kim SG; Son MK
Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24398847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor.”.
Sabour S
Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):104. PubMed ID: 24614882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and Osstell Mentor.
Oh JS; Kim SG; Lim SC; Ong JL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 19095473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: peri-implant bone loss follow-up. An in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.
Lachmann S; Laval JY; Jäger B; Axmann D; Gomez-Roman G; Groten M; Weber H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 16441788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment.
Oh JS; Kim SG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Mar; 113(3):e35-40. PubMed ID: 22669155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Evaluation of the Reliability of Periotest for Implant Stability Measurements: An In Vitro Study.
Bilhan H; Cilingir A; Bural C; Bilmenoglu C; Sakar O; Geckili O
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):e90-5. PubMed ID: 24593232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment.
Lachmann S; Laval JY; Axmann D; Weber H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 21483888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ.
Jaramillo R; Santos R; Lázaro P; Romero M; Rios-Santos JV; Bullón P; Fernández-Palacín A; Herrero-Climent M
Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 24776942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of Implant Stability Between Two Noninvasive Methods Using Submerged and Nonsubmerged Healing Protocols: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
AAl MA; El Far M; Sheta NM; Fayyad A; El Desouky E; Nabi NA; Ibrahim M
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Dec; 46(6):571-579. PubMed ID: 33494103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of the Osstell Implant Stability Quotient and Penguin Resonance Frequency Analysis to Evaluate Implant Stability.
Buyukguclu G; Ozkurt-Kayahan Z; Kazazoglu E
Implant Dent; 2018 Aug; 27(4):429-433. PubMed ID: 29762187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial.
Zix J; Hug S; Kessler-Liechti G; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 18700378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between dental implant stability determined by resonance frequency analysis measurements and peri-implant vertical defects: an in vitro study.
Tözüm TF; Turkyilmaz I; McGlumphy EA
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):739-44. PubMed ID: 18422511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants.
Cranin AN; DeGrado J; Kaufman M; Baraoidan M; DiGregorio R; Batgitis G; Lee Z
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9893520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length.
Sim CP; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):598-604. PubMed ID: 20666786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest.
Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S
J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11831235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of early loading on bony crest height and stability: a pilot study.
Brochu JF; Anderson JD; Zarb GA
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):506-12. PubMed ID: 16335170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of dental implant stability by two different techniques.
Kocak-Buyukdere A; Kayabay G
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 24(7):973-977. PubMed ID: 34290171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of the Osstell™ versus the Osstell Mentor™ to evaluate implant stability in human cadaver mandibles.
Snijders RS; van Wijk AJ; Lindeboom JA
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 40(10):774-9. PubMed ID: 23981012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of occlusal wear on bone loss and Periotest value of dental implants.
Engel E; Gomez-Roman G; Axmann-Krcmar D
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 12066640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
