These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24399083)

  • 1. Consequences of sequential sampling for meta-analysis.
    Braschi L; Botella J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1167-83. PubMed ID: 24399083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending the CLAST sequential rule to one-way ANOVA under group sampling.
    Ximénez C; Revuelta J
    Behav Res Methods; 2007 Feb; 39(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 17552475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of sample size in controlled experiments: the CLAST rule.
    Botella J; Ximénez C; Revuelta J; Suero M
    Behav Res Methods; 2006 Feb; 38(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 16817515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporation of sequential trials into a fixed effects meta-analysis.
    Todd S
    Stat Med; 1997 Dec; 16(24):2915-25. PubMed ID: 9483723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the Coefficient of Variation with Minimum Risk: A Sequential Method for Minimizing Sampling Error and Study Cost.
    Chattopadhyay B; Kelley K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):627-648. PubMed ID: 27712116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential analysis for microarray data based on sensitivity and meta-analysis.
    Marot G; Mayer CD
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article 3. PubMed ID: 19222386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.
    Lin L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204056. PubMed ID: 30212588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An examination of methods for sample size recalculation during an experiment.
    Betensky RA; Tierney C
    Stat Med; 1997 Nov; 16(22):2587-98. PubMed ID: 9403958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Jakobsen JC; Gluud C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):39. PubMed ID: 28264661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis.
    van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying over-estimation in early stopped clinical trials and the "freezing effect" on subsequent research.
    Wang H; Rosner GL; Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2016 Dec; 13(6):621-631. PubMed ID: 27271682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trial sequential methods for meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Wood J
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 26052847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (II): sample size re-estimation.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2041-54. PubMed ID: 22733687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.