These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24399927)

  • 1. The influence of prior experience and expected timing on vibrotactile discrimination.
    Karim M; Harris JA; Langdon A; Breakspear M
    Front Neurosci; 2013; 7():255. PubMed ID: 24399927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prior and present evidence: how prior experience interacts with present information in a perceptual decision making task.
    Karim M; Harris JA; Morley JW; Breakspear M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37580. PubMed ID: 22701521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges.
    Hellström A; Rammsayer TH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15111227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prior Information biases stimulus representations during vibrotactile decision making.
    Preuschhof C; Schubert T; Villringer A; Heekeren HR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):875-87. PubMed ID: 19413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of stimulus omission and interstimulus interval (ISI) on electrodermal habituation at short ISIs.
    Daniels BA; Davidson JA
    Br J Psychol; 1998 Aug; 89 ( Pt 3)():371-81. PubMed ID: 9734297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination sensitivity for short and long durations.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1033-43. PubMed ID: 25832187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus novelty, and not neural refractoriness, explains the repetition suppression of laser-evoked potentials.
    Wang AL; Mouraux A; Liang M; Iannetti GD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Oct; 104(4):2116-24. PubMed ID: 20592123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Longer Interstimulus Interval Yields Better Learning in Adults and Young Adolescents.
    Kjell K; Löwgren K; Rasmussen A
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2018; 12():299. PubMed ID: 30559655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using interstimulus interval to maximise sensitivity of the Psychomotor Vigilance Test to fatigue.
    Matthews RW; Ferguson SA; Sargent C; Zhou X; Kosmadopoulos A; Roach GD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt B):406-410. PubMed ID: 26563739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percept of the duration of a vibrotactile stimulus is altered by changing its amplitude.
    Francisco EM; Holden JK; Nguyen RH; Favorov OV; Tommerdahl M
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 26052273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual timing precision with vibrotactile, auditory, and multisensory stimuli.
    Villalonga MB; Sussman RF; Sekuler R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):2267-2280. PubMed ID: 33772447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The independency of the Bereitschaftspotential from previous stimulus-locked P3 in visuomotor response tasks.
    Quinzi F; Berchicci M; Bianco V; Perri RL; Di Russo F
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Mar; 56(3):e13296. PubMed ID: 30370568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The retention and disruption of color information in human short-term visual memory.
    Nemes VA; Parry NR; Whitaker D; McKeefry DJ
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 22286297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intramodal and crossmodal pairing and anchoring in comparisons of successive stimuli.
    Hellström Å; Cederström C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1197-211. PubMed ID: 24604542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-modal transfer of the conditioned eyeblink response during interstimulus interval discrimination training in young rats.
    Brown KL; Stanton ME
    Dev Psychobiol; 2008 Nov; 50(7):647-64. PubMed ID: 18726989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose-dependent deficits in dual interstimulus interval classical eyeblink conditioning tasks following neonatal binge alcohol exposure in rats.
    Brown KL; Calizo LH; Stanton ME
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Feb; 32(2):277-93. PubMed ID: 18162069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the utility of perceptual anchors during pure-tone frequency discrimination.
    Mathias SR; Varghese L; Micheyl C; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):371. PubMed ID: 32006971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eyelid response topography in differential interstimulus interval conditioning.
    Kadlac JA; Grant DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 May; 3(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 870612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priors Bias Perceptual Decisions in Autism, But Are Less Flexibly Adjusted to the Context.
    Sapey-Triomphe LA; Timmermans L; Wagemans J
    Autism Res; 2021 Jun; 14(6):1134-1146. PubMed ID: 33283970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of interstimulus interval on subjective categorical loudness judgements.
    Ruscetta MN; Palmer CV
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000; 11(10):570-4. PubMed ID: 11198074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.