These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24400081)

  • 1. What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84166. PubMed ID: 24400081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect.
    Röer JP; Rummel J; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Cogn; 2017 Nov; 1(1):2. PubMed ID: 31517180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():41-58. PubMed ID: 29574236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
    Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.
    Vachon F; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 21895389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loud Auditory Distractors Are More Difficult to Ignore After All.
    Alikadic L; Röer JP
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):163-171. PubMed ID: 36255065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Dentale S; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1542-57. PubMed ID: 22612161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
    Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.
    Kaiser S; Buchner A; Mieth L; Bell R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0274803. PubMed ID: 36206210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Buchner A; Röer JP
    Psychol Res; 2021 Nov; 85(8):2997-3009. PubMed ID: 33340342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):160-173. PubMed ID: 34255305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.
    Hughes RW; Marsh JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):427-442. PubMed ID: 31180705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 25621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.
    Kattner F; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.
    Marois A; Marsh JE; Vachon F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Feb; 141():64-74. PubMed ID: 30633950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.
    Bell R; Mieth L; Röer JP; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10185. PubMed ID: 31308413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age equivalence in auditory distraction by changing and deviant speech sounds.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Marsh JE; Buchner A
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):849-55. PubMed ID: 26523691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.