These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24400883)

  • 1. The assessment of a structured online formative assessment program: a randomised controlled trial.
    Palmer E; Devitt P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Jan; 14():8. PubMed ID: 24400883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
    Mitra NK; Barua A
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated online formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical students: benefits for learning.
    Velan GM; Jones P; McNeil HP; Kumar RK
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 8():52. PubMed ID: 19032738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limitations of student-driven formative assessment in a clinical clerkship. A randomised controlled trial.
    Palmer EJ; Devitt PG
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 May; 8():29. PubMed ID: 18471324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) as formative assessment in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cohort study.
    Deane RP; Joyce P; Murphy DJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26453191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of preclinical medical students' preference for summative or formative assessment for physiology learning.
    Rae MG; Abdulla MH
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Sep; 47(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 37141432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio)medical students: a randomised controlled study.
    Thijssen DHJ; Hopman MTE; van Wijngaarden MT; Hoenderop JGJ; Bindels RJM; Eijsvogels TMH
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Apr; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey.
    Evans DJ; Zeun P; Stanier RA
    J Anat; 2014 Mar; 224(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 24111930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum.
    Swinnerton BJ; Morris NP; Hotchkiss S; Pickering JD
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 27315160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
    Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
    Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating a technology supported interactive response system during the laboratory section of a histology course.
    Rinaldi VD; Lorr NA; Williams K
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):328-338. PubMed ID: 28678444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do students achieve the desired learning goals using open-book formative assessments?
    Minder SP; Weibel D; Wissmath B; Schmitz FM
    Int J Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 9():293-301. PubMed ID: 30457974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students.
    Chisnall B; Vince T; Hall S; Tribe R
    Int J Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 6():76-83. PubMed ID: 26094249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of formative assessment in pathophysiology education from students' perspective: a questionnaire study.
    Cong X; Zhang Y; Xu H; Liu LM; Zheng M; Xiang RL; Wang JY; Jia S; Cai JY; Liu C; Wu LL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Dec; 44(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 33155832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associations between formative practice quizzes and summative examination outcomes in a medical anatomy course.
    McNulty JA; Espiritu BR; Hoyt AE; Ensminger DC; Chandrasekhar AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24596276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.
    Buckley S; Coleman J; Davison I; Khan KS; Zamora J; Malick S; Morley D; Pollard D; Ashcroft T; Popovic C; Sayers J
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):282-98. PubMed ID: 19404891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.