These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24402716)

  • 1. Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations.
    Faragó T; Andics A; Devecseri V; Kis A; Gácsi M; Miklósi A
    Biol Lett; 2014 Jan; 10(1):20130926. PubMed ID: 24402716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial sounds following biological rules: A novel approach for non-verbal communication in HRI.
    Korcsok B; Faragó T; Ferdinandy B; Miklósi Á; Korondi P; Gácsi M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7080. PubMed ID: 32341387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Humans (Homo sapiens) judge the emotional content of piglet (Sus scrofa domestica) calls based on simple acoustic parameters, not personality, empathy, nor attitude toward animals.
    Maruščáková IL; Linhart P; Ratcliffe VF; Tallet C; Reby D; Špinka M
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 May; 129(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 25798794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion.
    Sauter DA; Eisner F; Calder AJ; Scott SK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2251-72. PubMed ID: 20437296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The acoustic correlates of valence depend on emotion family.
    Belyk M; Brown S
    J Voice; 2014 Jul; 28(4):523.e9-523.e18. PubMed ID: 24495430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensing emotion in voices: Negativity bias and gender differences in a validation study of the Oxford Vocal ('OxVoc') sounds database.
    Young KS; Parsons CE; LeBeau RT; Tabak BA; Sewart AR; Stein A; Kringelbach ML; Craske MG
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Aug; 29(8):967-977. PubMed ID: 27656902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-cultural differences in the processing of non-verbal affective vocalizations by Japanese and canadian listeners.
    Koeda M; Belin P; Hama T; Masuda T; Matsuura M; Okubo Y
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():105. PubMed ID: 23516137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgment of emotional nonlinguistic vocalizations: age-related differences.
    Fecteau S; Armony JL; Joanette Y; Belin P
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2005; 12(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15788222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateralized behavior and cardiac activity of dogs in response to human emotional vocalizations.
    Siniscalchi M; d'Ingeo S; Fornelli S; Quaranta A
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):77. PubMed ID: 29311574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When voices get emotional: a corpus of nonverbal vocalizations for research on emotion processing.
    Lima CF; Castro SL; Scott SK
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Dec; 45(4):1234-45. PubMed ID: 23444120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vocal contagion of emotions in non-human animals.
    Briefer EF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Feb; 285(1873):. PubMed ID: 29491174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In the ear of the beholder: how age shapes emotion processing in nonverbal vocalizations.
    Lima CF; Alves T; Scott SK; Castro SL
    Emotion; 2014 Feb; 14(1):145-160. PubMed ID: 24219391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The link between auditory salience and emotion intensity.
    Anikin A
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Sep; 34(6):1246-1259. PubMed ID: 32126893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The paradoxical role of emotional intensity in the perception of vocal affect.
    Holz N; Larrouy-Maestri P; Poeppel D
    Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9663. PubMed ID: 33958630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loud and unclear: Intense real-life vocalizations during affective situations are perceptually ambiguous and contextually malleable.
    Atias D; Todorov A; Liraz S; Eidinger A; Dror I; Maymon Y; Aviezer H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1842-1848. PubMed ID: 30589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do nonlinear vocal phenomena signal negative valence or high emotion intensity?
    Anikin A; Pisanski K; Reby D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Dec; 7(12):201306. PubMed ID: 33489278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human Empathy, Personality and Experience Affect the Emotion Ratings of Dog and Human Facial Expressions.
    Kujala MV; Somppi S; Jokela M; Vainio O; Parkkonen L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170730. PubMed ID: 28114335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-life and posed vocalizations to lottery wins differ fundamentally in their perceived valence.
    Atias D; Aviezer H
    Emotion; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1394-1399. PubMed ID: 36006704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dog growls express various contextual and affective content for human listeners.
    Faragó T; Takács N; Miklósi Á; Pongrácz P
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 May; 4(5):170134. PubMed ID: 28573021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dog and human neural sensitivity to voicelikeness: A comparative fMRI study.
    Bálint A; Szabó Á; Andics A; Gácsi M
    Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119791. PubMed ID: 36476565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.