These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24403145)

  • 1. The control of global brain dynamics: opposing actions of frontoparietal control and default mode networks on attention.
    Hellyer PJ; Shanahan M; Scott G; Wise RJ; Sharp DJ; Leech R
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(2):451-61. PubMed ID: 24403145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disrupted Intrinsic Connectivity among Default, Dorsal Attention, and Frontoparietal Control Networks in Individuals with Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Han K; Chapman SB; Krawczyk DC
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Feb; 22(2):263-79. PubMed ID: 26888622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instantaneous and causal connectivity in resting state brain networks derived from functional MRI data.
    Deshpande G; Santhanam P; Hu X
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):1043-52. PubMed ID: 20850549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between the default network and dorsal attention network vary across default subsystems, time, and cognitive states.
    Dixon ML; Andrews-Hanna JR; Spreng RN; Irving ZC; Mills C; Girn M; Christoff K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():632-649. PubMed ID: 28040543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous default network activity reflects behavioral variability independent of mind-wandering.
    Kucyi A; Esterman M; Riley CS; Valera EM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):13899-13904. PubMed ID: 27856733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks.
    Dixon ML; De La Vega A; Mills C; Andrews-Hanna J; Spreng RN; Cole MW; Christoff K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(7):E1598-E1607. PubMed ID: 29382744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weak task synchronization of default mode network in task based paradigms.
    Tripathi V; Garg R
    Neuroimage; 2022 May; 251():118940. PubMed ID: 35121184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precuneus is a functional core of the default-mode network.
    Utevsky AV; Smith DV; Huettel SA
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(3):932-40. PubMed ID: 24431451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional connectivity within and between intrinsic brain networks correlates with trait mind wandering.
    Godwin CA; Hunter MA; Bezdek MA; Lieberman G; Elkin-Frankston S; Romero VL; Witkiewitz K; Clark VP; Schumacher EH
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():140-153. PubMed ID: 28705691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hypostability in the default mode network and hyperstability in the frontoparietal control network of dynamic functional architecture during rumination.
    Chen 陈骁 X; Yan 严超赣 CG
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 241():118427. PubMed ID: 34311069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional coupling between frontoparietal control subnetworks bridges the default and dorsal attention networks.
    Yin S; Li Y; Chen A
    Brain Struct Funct; 2022 Sep; 227(7):2243-2260. PubMed ID: 35751677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Altered connectivity patterns among resting state networks in patients with ischemic white matter lesions.
    Ding JR; Ding X; Hua B; Xiong X; Wen Y; Ding Z; Wang Q; Thompson P
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2018 Oct; 12(5):1239-1250. PubMed ID: 29134612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in brain network activation and co-activation during multiple object tracking.
    Dørum ES; Alnæs D; Kaufmann T; Richard G; Lund MJ; Tønnesen S; Sneve MH; Mathiesen NC; Rustan ØG; Gjertsen Ø; Vatn S; Fure B; Andreassen OA; Nordvik JE; Westlye LT
    Brain Behav; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e00533. PubMed ID: 27843692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Di X; Biswal BB
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():53-9. PubMed ID: 23927904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related differences in the dynamic architecture of intrinsic networks.
    Madhyastha TM; Grabowski TJ
    Brain Connect; 2014 May; 4(4):231-41. PubMed ID: 24329046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuronal oscillations and functional interactions between resting state networks.
    Lei X; Wang Y; Yuan H; Mantini D
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Jul; 35(7):3517-28. PubMed ID: 25050432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large-scale network interactions involved in dividing attention between the external environment and internal thoughts to pursue two distinct goals.
    Maillet D; Beaty RE; Kucyi A; Schacter DL
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():49-59. PubMed ID: 31018153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct Cortical Recordings Suggest Temporal Order of Task-Evoked Responses in Human Dorsal Attention and Default Networks.
    Raccah O; Daitch AL; Kucyi A; Parvizi J
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10305-10313. PubMed ID: 30315126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention Shifts Recruit the Monkey Default Mode Network.
    Arsenault JT; Caspari N; Vandenberghe R; Vanduffel W
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 38(5):1202-1217. PubMed ID: 29263238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional interactions between large-scale networks during memory search.
    Kragel JE; Polyn SM
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Mar; 25(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 24084128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.