358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24403214)
1. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.
Epstein JI; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Pierorazio PM
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1019-24. PubMed ID: 22336380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.
King CR; McNeal JE; Gill H; Presti JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jun; 59(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 15145152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Helpap B; Egevad L
Virchows Arch; 2006 Dec; 449(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 17091254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.
Reese AC; Cowan JE; Brajtbord JS; Harris CR; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Cancer; 2012 Dec; 118(24):6046-54. PubMed ID: 22674220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gleason score 5 + 3 = 8 (grade group 4) prostate cancer-a rare occurrence with contemporary grading.
Kryvenko ON; Williamson SR; Schwartz LE; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2020 Mar; 97():40-51. PubMed ID: 31923450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
