These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24404600)

  • 21. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
    Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 10455386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correction for attenuation and visual response in digital radiography.
    Welande U; Yoshiura K; Li G; Sällström P; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12076052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital radiography: considerations for pediatric dentistry.
    Williamson GF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 17(8):556, 558. PubMed ID: 16323460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intraoral detectors. CCD, CMOS, TFT, and other devices.
    Sanderink GC; Miles DA
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):249-55, v. PubMed ID: 10740767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the performance of intraoral X-ray sensors using objective image quality assessment.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson C; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 May; 121(5):e129-37. PubMed ID: 27068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiopacity of dental materials using a digital X-ray system.
    Gu S; Rasimick BJ; Deutsch AS; Musikant BL
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):765-70. PubMed ID: 16360848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contrast curves of five different intraoral X-ray sensors: a technical note.
    Brüllmann DD; Kempkes B; d'Hoedt B; Schulze R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jun; 115(6):e55-61. PubMed ID: 23706925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10490744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of 4 Commercial Viewing Devices for Radiographic Perceptibility and Working Length Determination.
    Lally T; Geist JR; Yu Q; Himel VT; Sabey K
    J Endod; 2015 Jul; 41(7):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25863405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 10522200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Buyers's guide to digital radiograph-intraoral sensors. Examining one of dentistry's most effective diagnostic tools.
    Dent Today; 2009 Mar; 28(3):126, 128-33. PubMed ID: 19343834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensor-based intraoral digital radiography.
    Khocht A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 16(5):349-50. PubMed ID: 15344581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Ludlow J; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
    Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.