These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24404607)

  • 1. Corneal hysteresis with intraocular pressure of a wide range: a test on porcine eyes.
    Tao C; Han Z; Sun Y; Zhou C; Roberts C; Zhou D; Ren Q
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 29(12):850-4. PubMed ID: 24404607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision of ocular response analyzer.
    Goebels SC; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Aug; 37(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 22587394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recovery of corneal hysteresis after reduction of intraocular pressure in chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma.
    Sun L; Shen M; Wang J; Fang A; Xu A; Fang H; Lu F
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 147(6):1061-6, 1066.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19327738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos.
    Altan C; Kara N; Baz O; Satana B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 22399691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure].
    Hager A; Schroeder B; Sadeghi M; Grossherr M; Wiegand W
    Ophthalmologe; 2007 Jun; 104(6):484-9. PubMed ID: 17587093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty on corneal biomechanics.
    Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 94(6):e501-4. PubMed ID: 26749244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of sex differences in corneal hysteresis.
    Allam RS; Khalil NM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 25684160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with acromegaly.
    Altinkaynak H; Duru N; Ersoy R; Kalkan Akcay E; Ugurlu N; Cagil N; Cakir B
    Cornea; 2015 Jan; 34(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25379870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer.
    Kirwan C; O'Keefe M; Lanigan B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 17157583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.