BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24405254)

  • 1. Approval gap of pharmacogenomic biomarkers and in vitro companion diagnostics between the United States and Japan.
    Shimazawa R; Ikeda M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2014 Apr; 39(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24405254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pharmacogenomic biomarkers: Interpretation of information included in United States and Japanese drug labels.
    Shimazawa R; Ikeda M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2018 Aug; 43(4):500-506. PubMed ID: 29722046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspective for the development of companion diagnostics and regulatory landscape to encourage personalized medicine in Japan.
    Tazawa Y
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 25605056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International differences in companion diagnostic approvals: how are we able to manage the differences?
    Shimazawa R; Ikeda M
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2015 Feb; 15(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 25308218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will the Requirement by the US FDA to Simultaneously Co-Develop Companion Diagnostics (CDx) Delay the Approval of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for RTK-Rearranged (ROS1-, RET-, AXL-, PDGFR-α-, NTRK1-) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Globally?
    Ou SH; Soo RA; Kubo A; Kawaguchi T; Ahn MJ
    Front Oncol; 2014; 4():58. PubMed ID: 24744988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Co-Development of Oncology Drugs and Companion Diagnostics: Analyses of Approval Lags and Drug Development Periods in Recently Approved Cases in Japan.
    Tanaka A; Suzuki H; Toyoshima S; Nagai N
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2022 Jan; 56(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 34406635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN ON PHARMACEUTICALS REQUIRING COMPANION DIAGNOSTICS.
    Cowling T; Boucher M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(5):327-336. PubMed ID: 27955717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in pharmacogenomic biomarker information in package inserts from the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan.
    Shimazawa R; Ikeda M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2013 Dec; 38(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 23895776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CDx, NGS and regulation: five perspectives from the Pistoia Alliance.
    Wise J; Furness M; McWilliams S; Patton S
    Drug Discov Today; 2019 Nov; 24(11):2120-2125. PubMed ID: 31306783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gap between the US and Japan in coverage of pharmacogenomic biomarkers by health insurance programs: More coverage is needed in Japan.
    Hikino K; Fukunaga K; Mushiroda T
    Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2018 Dec; 33(6):243-249. PubMed ID: 30360950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twenty-five years with companion diagnostics.
    Jørgensen JT
    Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Dec; 12(6):65. PubMed ID: 37953243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Companion and complementary diagnostics for infectious diseases.
    Dailey PJ; Elbeik T; Holodniy M
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2020 Jun; 20(6):619-636. PubMed ID: 32031431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similarities and differences in the oncology drug approval process between FDA and European Union with emphasis on in vitro companion diagnostics.
    Senderowicz AM; Pfaff O
    Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Mar; 20(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 24634467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing Companion Diagnostic for US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Hematological and Oncological Drugs.
    Jørgensen JT
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2022 Jun; 6():e2200100. PubMed ID: 35709402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics.
    Luo D; Smith JA; Meadows NA; Schuh A; Manescu KE; Bure K; Davies B; Horne R; Kope M; DiGiusto DL; Brindley DA
    Front Genet; 2015; 6():357. PubMed ID: 26858745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in Companion Diagnostic Labelling: Implementation of FDA's April 2020 Guidance for Industry for In Vitro CDx Labeling for Specific Oncology Therapeutic Groups.
    Cooper L; Chen J
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2022 Sep; 56(5):689-697. PubMed ID: 35689144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulatory issues on breath tests and updates of recent advances on [13C]-breath tests.
    Modak AS
    J Breath Res; 2013 Sep; 7(3):037103. PubMed ID: 23774086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Companion diagnostics: a regulatory perspective from the last 5 years of molecular companion diagnostic approvals.
    Roscoe DM; Hu YF; Philip R
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2015; 15(7):869-80. PubMed ID: 26109316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomarkers to improve the benefit/risk balance for approved therapeutics: a US FDA perspective on personalized medicine.
    Sapsford KE; Tezak Z; Kondratovich M; Pacanowski MA; Zineh I; Mansfield E
    Ther Deliv; 2010 Nov; 1(5):631-41. PubMed ID: 22833953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The current landscape of the FDA approved companion diagnostics.
    Jørgensen JT
    Transl Oncol; 2021 Jun; 14(6):101063. PubMed ID: 33714919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.