194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24405313)
1. Onsite provision of specialized contraceptive services: does Title X funding enhance access?
Thiel de Bocanegra H; Cross Riedel J; Menz M; Darney PD; Brindis CD
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 May; 23(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24405313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancing service delivery through title x funding: findings from California.
de Bocanegra HT; Maguire F; Hulett D; Horsley K; Puffer M; Brindis CD
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2012 Dec; 44(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23231334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of adherence to chlamydia screening guidelines among Title X providers and non-Title X providers in the California Family Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment Program.
Chow JM; de Bocanegra HT; Hulett D; Park HY; Darney P
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2012 Aug; 21(8):837-42. PubMed ID: 22694761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers.
Bornstein M; Carter M; Zapata L; Gavin L; Moskosky S
Contraception; 2018 May; 97(5):405-410. PubMed ID: 29253581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-acting reversible contraception method use among Title X providers and non-Title X providers in California.
Park HY; Rodriguez MI; Hulett D; Darney PD; Thiel de Bocanegra H
Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 22633245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Threats to family planning services in Michigan: organizational responses to economic and political challenges.
Dalton VK; Jacobson PD; Berson-Grand J; Weisman CS
Womens Health Issues; 2005; 15(3):117-25. PubMed ID: 15894197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. agencies providing publicly funded contraceptive services in 1999.
Finer LB; Darroch JE; Frost JJ
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2002; 34(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 11990635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The provision and funding of contraceptive services at publicly funded family planning agencies: 1995-2003.
Lindberg LD; Frost JJ; Sten C; Dailard C
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2006 Mar; 38(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16554270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The provision of public-sector services by family planning agencies in 1995.
Frost JJ; Bolzan M
Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 9119045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Provision of contraceptive and related services by publicly funded family planning clinics, 2003.
Lindberg LD; Frost JJ; Sten C; Dailard C
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2006 Sep; 38(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 16963387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994.
Frost JJ
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(3):92-100. PubMed ID: 8827144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four aspects of the scope and quality of family planning services in US publicly funded health centers: Results from a survey of health center administrators.
Carter MW; Gavin L; Zapata LB; Bornstein M; Mautone-Smith N; Moskosky SB
Contraception; 2016 Oct; 94(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 27125894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Public or private providers? U.S. women's use of reproductive health services.
Frost JJ
Fam Plann Perspect; 2001; 33(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11271546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use.
Landry DJ; Wei J; Frost JJ
Contraception; 2008 Jul; 78(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 18555817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing the provision of long-acting reversible contraception in California.
Biggs MA; Harper CC; Malvin J; Brindis CD
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 123(3):593-602. PubMed ID: 24499746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. California Family Planning Health Care Providers' Challenges to Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Provision.
Biggs MA; Harper CC; Brindis CD
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 126(2):338-345. PubMed ID: 26241424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is economic inequality in family planning in India associated with the private sector?
Kumar A; Jain AK; Aruldas K; Mozumdar A; Shukla A; Acharya R; Ram F; Saggurti N
J Biosoc Sci; 2020 Mar; 52(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 31232242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Organized family planning services in the United States, 1976-1977.
Torres A
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):342-7. PubMed ID: 401079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilization of Private Sector Family Planning Services in Malaysia.
Lai SL; Tey NP; Mahmud A; Ismail N
Int Q Community Health Educ; 2021 Jul; 41(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 33167794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
