These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24406538)
1. A peer into the process.. Huynh K J Wound Care; 2014 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 24406538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers. Malay DS J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors? Laube RE BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Responding to fraud. Kennedy D Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5804):1353. PubMed ID: 17138870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides. Wylie DT Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Misconduct in scientific publishing. Chan DL J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Jun; 21(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 21631701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards. Gordon SE J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals. Bartholomew RE J R Soc Med; 2014 Oct; 107(10):384-5. PubMed ID: 25271271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith. Freshwater D J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Feb; 13(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16441386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hwang case review committee misses the mark. Rossner M J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?]. Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review: an inexact but essential part of scientific publishing. Glick M J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):568, 570, 572. PubMed ID: 17473026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned. Adam D; Knight J Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]