These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24406538)

  • 1. A peer into the process..
    Huynh K
    J Wound Care; 2014 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 24406538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors?
    Laube RE
    BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7487):364. PubMed ID: 15705711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responding to fraud.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5804):1353. PubMed ID: 17138870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
    Wylie DT
    Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misconduct in scientific publishing.
    Chan DL
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2011 Jun; 21(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 21631701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
    Gordon SE
    J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals.
    Bartholomew RE
    J R Soc Med; 2014 Oct; 107(10):384-5. PubMed ID: 25271271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication ethics.
    Freeman PB
    Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Too good to be true].
    Haug C
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Aug; 126(15):1891. PubMed ID: 16915306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Q&A: Re-review opt-out and painless publishing.
    Robertson M
    BMC Biol; 2013 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 23445866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editors and publishing: integrity, trust and faith.
    Freshwater D
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2006 Feb; 13(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16441386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hwang case review committee misses the mark.
    Rossner M
    J Cell Biol; 2007 Jan; 176(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17210952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Copy is fraudulent--but what is the consequence?].
    Nielsen OH; Schroeder TV
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Nov; 168(45):3891. PubMed ID: 17118247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reminder about scholarly integrity.
    Krauss JB
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2003 Dec; 17(6):247-8. PubMed ID: 14685948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: an inexact but essential part of scientific publishing.
    Glick M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 May; 138(5):568, 570, 572. PubMed ID: 17473026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The manuscript review process.
    Triadafilopoulos G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):200-201. PubMed ID: 32047304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.