372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24406564)
1. Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry.
Taylor HO; Morrison CS; Linden O; Phillips B; Chang J; Byrne ME; Sullivan SR; Forrest CR
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 24406564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Relationship between Age and Facial Asymmetry.
Linden OE; He JK; Morrison CS; Sullivan SR; Taylor HOB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Nov; 142(5):1145-1152. PubMed ID: 30511968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Quantitative Analysis of Facial Asymmetry in Torticollis Using 3-Dimensional Photogrammetry.
Baratta VM; Linden OE; Byrne ME; Sullivan SR; Taylor HO
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Jan; 59(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 33593100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry after mandibular reconstruction: validation of a new method using stereophotogrammetry.
Verhoeven TJ; Coppen C; Barkhuysen R; Bronkhorst EM; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22939875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of a Method for Computing Facial Symmetry Plane and Degree of Asymmetry Based on 3D-data.
Hartmann J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Benz M; Häusler G; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Nov; 68(6):477-90. PubMed ID: 18034288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial thirds-based evaluation of facial asymmetry using stereophotogrammetric devices: Application to facial palsy subjects.
Codari M; Pucciarelli V; Stangoni F; Zago M; Tarabbia F; Biglioli F; Sforza C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 45(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 27939040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative analysis of facial symmetry by using three-dimensional technology.
Wu Z; Gao X; Long H; Lai W
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):277. PubMed ID: 35799192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging in Adults: Validating the Precision and Repeatability of a Global Approach.
Kornreich D; Mitchell AA; Webb BD; Cristian I; Jabs EW
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 25489769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with hemifacial microsomia using stereophotogrammetry.
Cassi D; Battistoni G; Magnifico M; Di Blasio C; Pedrazzi G; Di Blasio A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):179-184. PubMed ID: 30527381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nasal Symmetry Following Primary Correction of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity.
Linden OE; Taylor HO; Vasudavan S; Byrne ME; Deutsch CK; Mulliken JB; Sullivan SR
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Nov; 54(6):715-719. PubMed ID: 27441702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry among pre-pubertal class III subjects: a controlled study.
Ovsenik M; Perinetti G; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Primozic J
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 24062380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative 3D soft tissue analysis of symmetry prior to and after unilateral cleft lip repair compared with non-cleft persons (performed in Cambodia).
Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Chaitidis D; Berg-Boerner I; Krol Z; Kovacs L; Schwenzer NF; Zimmerer S; Holberg C; Zeilhofer HF
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 36(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 18701312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effect of Orthognathic Surgery on Soft-Tissue Facial Asymmetry: A Longitudinal Three-Dimensional Analysis.
Da Pozzo F; Gibelli D; Beltramini GA; Dolci C; Giannì AB; Sforza C
J Craniofac Surg; 2020 Sep; 31(6):1578-1582. PubMed ID: 32282669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantifying Normal Craniofacial Form and Baseline Craniofacial Asymmetry in the Pediatric Population.
Cho MJ; Hallac RR; Ramesh J; Seaward JR; Hermann NV; Darvann TA; Lipira A; Kane AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Mar; 141(3):380e-387e. PubMed ID: 29481404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of facial asymmetry: A comparative study of landmark-based and surface-based registrations.
Verhoeven T; Xi T; Schreurs R; Bergé S; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1131-6. PubMed ID: 27519663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measured symmetry of facial 3D shape and perceived facial symmetry and attractiveness before and after orthognathic surgery.
Ostwald J; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Runte C; Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 25841308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging.
Patel A; Islam SM; Murray K; Goonewardene MS
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():36. PubMed ID: 26490376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Tartaglia G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Nov; 52(11):1126-32. PubMed ID: 7965306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison.
Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional analysis of facial symmetry in cleft lip and palate patients using optical surface data.
Stauber I; Vairaktaris E; Holst A; Schuster M; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Nkenke E
J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):268-82. PubMed ID: 18797831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
