378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24406564)
41. Improved cephalometric measurements for the assessment of facial asymmetries using stereophotogrammetry.
Sperwien AF
Z Morphol Anthropol; 1985; 76(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 4090595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Use of the matching optimal symmetry plane method in planning surgical correction of facial asymmetry--a preliminary report of 20 patients.
Wong TY; Liu JK; Fang JJ; Wu TC; Tu YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1180.e1-13. PubMed ID: 24742699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessment of facial asymmetry in growing subjects with a three-dimensional laser scanning system.
Primozic J; Perinetti G; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2012 Nov; 15(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 23020694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry.
Ras F; Habets LL; van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 7639437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Three-dimensional facial characteristics of Caucasian infants without cleft and correlation with body measurements.
White JE; Ayoub AF; Hosey MT; Bock M; Bowman A; Bowman J; Siebert JP; Ray A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Nov; 41(6):593-602. PubMed ID: 15516161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A quantitative three-dimensional assessment of abnormal variations in facial soft tissues of adult patients with cleft lip and palate.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Dellavia C; Tartaglia GM; Sozzi D; Carù A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2003 Sep; 40(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 12943431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Facial asymmetry in unilateral coronal synostosis: long-term results after fronto-orbital advancement.
Oh AK; Wong J; Ohta E; Rogers GF; Deutsch CK; Mulliken JB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Feb; 121(2):545-562. PubMed ID: 18300974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Surface topography asymmetry maps categorizing external deformity in scoliosis.
Komeili A; Westover LM; Parent EC; Moreau M; El-Rich M; Adeeb S
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):973-83.e2. PubMed ID: 24361358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry.
Meyer-Marcotty P; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Bareis U; Hartmann J; Kochel J
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 21355063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis - A comparison of recent approaches.
Berlin NF; Berssenbrügge P; Runte C; Wermker K; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 24041610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Anthropometric Evaluation of Periorbital Region and Facial Projection Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry.
Jodeh DS; Curtis H; Cray JJ; Ford J; Decker S; Rottgers SA
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2017-2020. PubMed ID: 30277938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Development and reproducibility of a 3D stereophotogrammetric reference frame for facial soft tissue growth of babies and young children with and without orofacial clefts.
Brons S; van Beusichem ME; Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 22920646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Soft tissue changes after orthodontic surgical correction of jaws asymmetry evaluated by three-dimensional surface laser scanner.
Verzé L; Bianchi FA; Schellino E; Ramieri G
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1448-52. PubMed ID: 22976633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Three-dimensional evaluation of the association between face and back asymmetry among pre-pubertal subjects.
Primozic J; Antolic V; Ovsenik M; Primozic J
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2023 Jun; 24(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 36976296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Advances in determination of median sagittal plane of facial soft tissue].
Xiao N; Wang Y; Zhao YJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):495-499. PubMed ID: 29996372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry using dense correspondence, symmetry, and midline analysis.
Lum V; Goonewardene MS; Mian A; Eastwood P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jul; 158(1):134-146. PubMed ID: 32414548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of 2 methods of making surgical models for correction of facial asymmetry.
Wong TY; Fang JJ; Chung CH; Huang JS; Lee JW
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Feb; 63(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 15690288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Association of facial asymmetry and nasal septal deviation in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in East Asians.
Lee JS; Lee H; Kim JW; Chang M; Park M; Baek S
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 24(5):1544-8. PubMed ID: 24036723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
