142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24406579)
1. Patient-specific implants compared with stored bone grafts for patients with interval cranioplasty.
Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Essers B; ter Laak MP; Steiner T; Kessler P
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):206-9. PubMed ID: 24406579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts--success and cost analysis.
Lethaus B; Bloebaum M; Koper D; Poort-Ter Laak M; Kessler P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1948-51. PubMed ID: 25443869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.
Oliver JD; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Vyas KS; Sharaf B
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 May; 82(5S Suppl 4):S289-S294. PubMed ID: 30973834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analyzing the Cost of Autogenous Cranioplasty Versus Custom-Made Patient-Specific Alloplastic Cranioplasty.
Mrad MA; Murrad K; Antonyshyn O
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1260-1263. PubMed ID: 28582300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
O'Reilly EB; Barnett S; Madden C; Welch B; Mickey B; Rozen S
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model.
Lethaus B; Safi Y; ter Laak-Poort M; Kloss-Brandstätter A; Banki F; Robbenmenke C; Steinseifer U; Kessler P
J Neurotrauma; 2012 Apr; 29(6):1077-83. PubMed ID: 22017579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Punchak M; Chung LK; Lagman C; Bui TT; Lazareff J; Rezzadeh K; Jarrahy R; Yang I
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():30-35. PubMed ID: 28377284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants polyether ether ketone with computer-assisted planning.
Manrique OJ; Lalezarzadeh F; Dayan E; Shin J; Buchbinder D; Smith M
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):663-6. PubMed ID: 25974770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polyether Ether Ketone Cranioplasties Are Permeable to Diagnostic Ultrasound.
Mursch K; Behnke-Mursch J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():142-143. PubMed ID: 29920388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
Ng ZY; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants.
Jonkergouw J; van de Vijfeijken SE; Nout E; Theys T; Van de Casteele E; Folkersma H; Depauw PR; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1266-72. PubMed ID: 27524384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants.
Gilardino MS; Karunanayake M; Al-Humsi T; Izadpanah A; Al-Ajmi H; Marcoux J; Atkinson J; Farmer JP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 25534061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.
Rammos CK; Cayci C; Castro-Garcia JA; Feiz-Erfan I; Lettieri SC
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May; 26(3):631-3. PubMed ID: 25901667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Large Multicenter Retrospective Research on Embedded Cranioplasty and Covered Cranioplasty.
Zhang Q; Yuan Y; Li X; Sun T; Zhou Y; Yu H; Guan J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e645-e651. PubMed ID: 29374612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Utility of Polyether-Ether-Ketone Implants Adjacent to Sinus Cavities After Craniofacial Trauma.
Suresh V; Anolik R; Powers D
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 76(11):2361-2369. PubMed ID: 29852139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complex skull defects reconstruction with САD/САМ titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants.
Eolchiyan SA
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2014; 78(4):3-13. PubMed ID: 25406805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
