These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24406605)

  • 1. Quantification of facial movements by optical instruments: surface laser scanning and optoelectronic three-dimensional motion analyzer.
    Sidequersky FV; Verzé L; Mapelli A; Ramieri GA; Sforza C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e65-70. PubMed ID: 24406605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of facial movements by surface laser scanning.
    Verzé L; Nasi A; Quaranta F; Vasino V; Prini V; Ramieri G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 21187777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-dimensional study of facial mimicry in healthy young adults.
    Sforza C; Galante D; Shirai YF; Ferrario VF
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 19932974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial movement before and after masseteric-facial nerves anastomosis: a three-dimensional optoelectronic pilot study.
    Sforza C; Frigerio A; Mapelli A; Mandelli F; Sidequersky FV; Colombo V; Ferrario VF; Biglioli F
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 40(5):473-9. PubMed ID: 21872484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomy of emotion: a 3D study of facial mimicry.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Eur J Histochem; 2007; 51 Suppl 1():45-52. PubMed ID: 17703593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).
    Al-Anezi T; Khambay B; Peng MJ; O'Leary E; Ju X; Ayoub A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 23218511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of age and sex on facial mimicry: a three-dimensional study in healthy adults.
    Sforza C; Mapelli A; Galante D; Moriconi S; Ibba TM; Ferraro L; Ferrario VF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(10):990-9. PubMed ID: 20598508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial mobility after bimaxillary surgery in class III patients: a three-dimensional study.
    Verzé L; Bianchi FA; Dell'Acqua A; Prini V; Ramieri GA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2304-7. PubMed ID: 22134264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial mimicry after conservative parotidectomy: a three-dimensional optoelectronic study.
    Sforza C; Guzzo M; Mapelli A; Ibba TM; Scaramellini G; Ferrario VF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):986-93. PubMed ID: 22456104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of smiling on facial asymmetry in adults: a 3D evaluation.
    Darby LJ; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 26999885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of the relationship between wrinkle formation and deformation of the skin using three-dimensional motion analysis.
    Fujimura T
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e318-24. PubMed ID: 22724632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic three-dimensional quantitative analysis for evaluation of facial movement.
    Hontanilla B; Aubá C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 17569607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
    Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of three methods to evaluate the position of an artificial ear on the deficient side of the face from a three-dimensional surface scan of patients with hemifacial microsomia.
    Coward TJ; Watson RM; Richards R; Scott BJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 22371838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. I. Vector of displacement.
    Trotman CA; Faraway JJ; Silvester KT; Greenlee GM; Johnston LE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Mar; 35(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 9527310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative evaluation of facial movement and morphology.
    Vimercati SL; Rigoldi C; Albertini G; Crivellini M; Galli M
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 Apr; 121(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 22606928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Nonverbal Facial Expressions Using a 3D Motion Capture System.
    Ju X; O'Leary E; Peng M; Al-Anezi T; Ayoub A; Khambay B
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 25531739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional motion analysis - an exploratory study. Part 1: assessment of facial movement.
    Popat H; Richmond S; Playle R; Marshall D; Rosin P; Cosker D
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 18950318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative dynamic analysis of the nasolabial complex using 3D motion capture: A normative data set.
    Lowney CJ; Hsung TC; Morris DO; Khambay BS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Sep; 71(9):1332-1345. PubMed ID: 29958843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.