BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24407309)

  • 1. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.
    Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation.
    Huang B; Schroeder M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Sep; 6():19. PubMed ID: 16995956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces.
    Burgoyne NJ; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(11):1335-42. PubMed ID: 16522669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
    He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Virtual Screening of the Drug Protein with a Few Crystal Structures Based on the Adaboost-SVM.
    Wang MY; Li P; Qiao PL
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():4809831. PubMed ID: 27127534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3085-95. PubMed ID: 20839234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using support vector machines.
    Koike A; Takagi T
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Feb; 17(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 15047913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design.
    Henrich S; Salo-Ahen OM; Huang B; Rippmann FF; Cruciani G; Wade RC
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19746440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2005 Jun; 4(6):752-61. PubMed ID: 15757999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty.
    Vajda S
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15981248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition.
    Ma XH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Gong XQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 15981260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.