These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24407309)

  • 1. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of cavities on protein surface using multiple computational approaches for drug binding site prediction.
    Zhang Z; Li Y; Lin B; Schroeder M; Huang B
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(15):2083-8. PubMed ID: 21636590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation.
    Huang B; Schroeder M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Sep; 6():19. PubMed ID: 16995956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting protein interaction sites: binding hot-spots in protein-protein and protein-ligand interfaces.
    Burgoyne NJ; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(11):1335-42. PubMed ID: 16522669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting protein-ligand binding sites based on an improved geometric algorithm.
    He J; Wei DQ; Wang JF; Chou KC
    Protein Pept Lett; 2011 Oct; 18(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 21592081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Virtual Screening of the Drug Protein with a Few Crystal Structures Based on the Adaboost-SVM.
    Wang MY; Li P; Qiao PL
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():4809831. PubMed ID: 27127534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2010 Nov; 78(15):3085-95. PubMed ID: 20839234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using support vector machines.
    Koike A; Takagi T
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2004 Feb; 17(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 15047913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design.
    Henrich S; Salo-Ahen OM; Huang B; Rippmann FF; Cruciani G; Wade RC
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 19746440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2005 Jun; 4(6):752-61. PubMed ID: 15757999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty.
    Vajda S
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15981248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition.
    Ma XH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Gong XQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 15981260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.