These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24407571)

  • 1. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impact on survival and quality of life of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to patients with early-stage cervical cancer].
    Yang ZJ; Chen YL; Yao DS; Zhang JQ; Li F; Li L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 46(11):854-9. PubMed ID: 22333237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Zhu T; Chen X; Zhu J; Chen Y; Yu A; Chen L; Shou H; Wu M; Zhang P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jul; 27(6):1222-1227. PubMed ID: 28640767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
    Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery.
    Laterza RM; Uccella S; Casarin J; Morosi C; Serati M; Koelbl H; Ghezzi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 26807638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing thermal welding instrument-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in the management of FIGO IB1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma.
    Chen CH; Wang PH; Chiu LH; Chang WH
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(5):442-5. PubMed ID: 24475579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.