107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24407579)
1. Protection against squamous cell carcinoma and cervical adenocarcinoma afforded by cervical cytology screening: a cross-sectional study.
Vale DB; Braganca JF; Morais SS; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 24407579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in women aged <30 years has a prevalence pattern resembling low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Vale DB; Westin MC; Zeferino LC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Oct; 121(10):576-81. PubMed ID: 23765869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cytological screening turned out effective also for adenocarcinoma: a population-based case-control study in Trento, Italy.
Crocetti E; Battisti L; Betta A; Palma PD; Paci E; Piffer S; Pojer A; Polla E; Zappa M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 18090131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why Do Women Get Cervical Cancer in an Organized Screening Program in Canada?
Jackson R; Wang L; Jembere N; Murphy J; Kupets R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 30489433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the diagnostic value of cervical cytology and HPV HR DNA testing for the diagnosis of low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions across different age groups.
Paluszkiewicz A; Pruski D; Iwaniec K; Kędzia W
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(3):141-146. PubMed ID: 28397203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytological screening history of patients with early invasive cervical cancer.
Turner MJ; Keane DP; Flannelly GM; Lenehan PM; Murphy JF; Foley ME
Ir Med J; 1990 Jun; 83(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 2202697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association between concurrent genital bleeding and cervical cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Xavier-Júnior JC; Vale DB; Zeferino LC; Dufloth RM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Sep; 94(9):949-53. PubMed ID: 26033639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cancer screening intervals and management for women living with HIV: a risk benchmarking approach.
Robbins HA; Strickler HD; Massad LS; Pierce CB; Darragh TM; Minkoff H; Keller MJ; Fischl M; Palefsky J; Flowers L; Rahangdale L; Milam J; Shrestha S; Colie C; DʼSouza G
AIDS; 2017 Apr; 31(7):1035-1044. PubMed ID: 28323758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A population-based evaluation of cervical screening in the United States: 2008-2011.
Cuzick J; Myers O; Hunt WC; Robertson M; Joste NE; Castle PE; Benard VB; Wheeler CM;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 May; 23(5):765-73. PubMed ID: 24302677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing incidence of invasive and in situ cervical adenocarcinoma in the Netherlands during 2004-2013.
van der Horst J; Siebers AG; Bulten J; Massuger LF; de Kok IM
Cancer Med; 2017 Feb; 6(2):416-423. PubMed ID: 28102052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Sasieni P; Castanon A; Cuzick J
Int J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 125(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 19449379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Underscreened Women Remain Overrepresented in the Pool of Cervical Cancer Cases in Spain: A Need to Rethink the Screening Interventions.
Ibáñez R; Alejo M; Combalia N; Tarroch X; Autonell J; Codina L; Culubret M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():605375. PubMed ID: 26180804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the incidence of cervical tumours by disease stage in a cytology-based screening programme.
Bucchi L; Mancini S; Baldacchini F; Giuliani O; Ravaioli A; Vattiato R; Falcini F; Giorgi Rossi P; Campari C; Canuti D; Di Felice E; de Bianchi PS; Ferretti S;
J Med Screen; 2020 Jun; 27(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 31690178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
