These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24408553)

  • 21. Spanish/English bilingual listeners on clinical word recognition tests: what to expect and how to predict.
    Shi LF; Sánchez D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1096-110. PubMed ID: 20689035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of foreign accent syndrome speech and its relation to segmental characteristics.
    Dankovičová J; Hunt C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):85-120. PubMed ID: 21275581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemispheric specialization for linguistic processing of sung speech.
    Yelle SK; Grimshaw GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Feb; 108(1):219-28. PubMed ID: 19425463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
    Chang CB; Mishler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts.
    Davidson L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 21090904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.
    Borg E; Edquist G; Reinholdson AC; Risberg A; McAllister B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1061-77. PubMed ID: 17512613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contribution of linguistic variables to bilingual listeners' perception of degraded English sentences.
    Shi LF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):219-34. PubMed ID: 22199200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When it matters how you pronounce it: the influence of regional accents on job interview outcome.
    Rakić T; Steffens MC; Mummendey A
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 102(4):868-83. PubMed ID: 21988389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Imitation improves language comprehension.
    Adank P; Hagoort P; Bekkering H
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21135202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When correction turns positive: processing corrective prosody in Dutch.
    Dimitrova DV; Stowe LA; Hoeks JC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126299. PubMed ID: 25973607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neurophysiological evidence of delayed segmentation in a foreign language.
    Snijders TM; Kooijman V; Cutler A; Hagoort P
    Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 1178():106-13. PubMed ID: 17931604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of a hearing aid noise reduction algorithm on the acquisition of novel speech contrasts.
    Marcoux AM; Yathiraj A; Côté I; Logan J
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 45(12):707-14. PubMed ID: 17132559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese.
    Tajima K; Kato H; Rothwell A; Akahane-Yamada R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):397-413. PubMed ID: 18177169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment.
    Nooteboom SG; Kruyt JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1512-24. PubMed ID: 3693693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent.
    Boula de Mareüil P; Vieru-Dimulescu B
    Phonetica; 2006; 63(4):247-67. PubMed ID: 17293645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of Parkinson's disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners.
    Pell MD; Cheang HS; Leonard CL
    Brain Lang; 2006 May; 97(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 16226803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.