These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Flux or speed? Examining speckle contrast imaging of vascular flows. Kazmi SM; Faraji E; Davis MA; Huang YY; Zhang XJ; Dunn AK Biomed Opt Express; 2015 Jul; 6(7):2588-608. PubMed ID: 26203384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sensitivity of laser speckle contrast imaging to flow perturbations in the cortex. Davis MA; Gagnon L; Boas DA; Dunn AK Biomed Opt Express; 2016 Mar; 7(3):759-75. PubMed ID: 27231587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multi-exposure Speckle Imaging for Quantitative Evaluation of Cortical Blood Flow. Santorelli A; Sullender CT; Dunn AK Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2616():97-111. PubMed ID: 36715931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transmissive-detected laser speckle contrast imaging for blood flow monitoring in thick tissue: from Monte Carlo simulation to experimental demonstration. Li DY; Xia Q; Yu TT; Zhu JT; Zhu D Light Sci Appl; 2021 Dec; 10(1):241. PubMed ID: 34862369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Direct characterization of tissue dynamics with laser speckle contrast imaging. Zheng S; Mertz J Biomed Opt Express; 2022 Aug; 13(8):4118-4133. PubMed ID: 36032565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wavelength and frequency optimization in spatial frequency domain imaging for two-layer tissue. Wang Y; Kang X; Zhang Y; Shi Z; Ren H; Wang Q; Chen M; Zhang Y Biomed Opt Express; 2022 Jun; 13(6):3224-3242. PubMed ID: 35781948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laser speckle imaging based on photothermally driven convection. Regan C; Choi B J Biomed Opt; 2016 Feb; 21(2):26011. PubMed ID: 26927221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Laser speckle imaging of flowing blood: A numerical study. van As K; Boterman J; Kleijn CR; Kenjeres S; Bhattacharya N Phys Rev E; 2019 Sep; 100(3-1):033317. PubMed ID: 31639980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of optical aberrations on depth-specific spatial frequency domain techniques. Majedy M; Das N; Johansson J; Saager R J Biomed Opt; 2022 Nov; 27(11):. PubMed ID: 36358008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Improving the estimation of flow speed for laser speckle imaging with single exposure time. Wang Y; Wen D; Chen X; Huang Q; Chen M; Lu J; Li P Opt Lett; 2017 Jan; 42(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 28059177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Establishing the quantitative relationship between diffuse speckle contrast analysis signals with absolute blood flow. Liu J; Wang H; Wang P; Jin Z; Li W; Zhang H; Shen Z; Xiong D Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Oct; 9(10):4792-4806. PubMed ID: 30319903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spatial versus temporal laser speckle contrast analyses in the presence of static optical scatterers. Ramirez-San-Juan JC; Regan C; Coyotl-Ocelotl B; Choi B J Biomed Opt; 2014; 19(10):106009. PubMed ID: 25334006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Discrimination between Doppler-shifted and non-shifted light in coherence domain path length resolved measurements of multiply scattered light. Varghese B; Rajan V; van Leeuwen TG; Steenbergen W Opt Express; 2007 Oct; 15(20):13340-50. PubMed ID: 19550604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]