131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24410284)
1. Sexually selected traits evolve positive allometry when some matings occur irrespective of the trait.
Fromhage L; Kokko H
Evolution; 2014 May; 68(5):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24410284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas.
Bonduriansky R
Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):838-49. PubMed ID: 17439616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Condition dependence and the maintenance of genetic variance in a sexually dimorphic black scavenger fly.
Dmitriew C; Blanckenhorn WU
J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2408-19. PubMed ID: 25345564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Live fast, die young: trade-offs between fitness components and sexually antagonistic selection on weaponry in Soay sheep.
Robinson MR; Pilkington JG; Clutton-Brock TH; Pemberton JM; Kruuk LE
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):2168-81. PubMed ID: 17133873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolution of male and female genitalia following release from sexual selection.
Cayetano L; Maklakov AA; Brooks RC; Bonduriansky R
Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 21790567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pitfalls in understanding the functional significance of genital allometry.
Eberhard W; Rodriguez RL; Polihronakis M
J Evol Biol; 2009 Mar; 22(3):435-45. PubMed ID: 19170826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits.
Bonduriansky R; Day T
Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2450-8. PubMed ID: 14686522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Allometry and sexually dimorphic traits in male anurans.
Schulte-Hostedde AI; Kuula S; Martin C; Schank CC; Lesbarrères D
J Evol Biol; 2011 May; 24(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 21418118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why the Static Allometry of Sexually-Selected Traits Is So Variable: The Importance of Function.
Rodríguez RL; Eberhard WG
Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Nov; 59(5):1290-1302. PubMed ID: 31086950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae).
Bonduriansky R; Rowe L
Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 15792234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive allometry and the prehistory of sexual selection.
Tomkins JL; LeBas NR; Witton MP; Martill DM; Humphries S
Am Nat; 2010 Aug; 176(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 20565262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential investment in pre- vs. post-copulatory sexual selection reinforces a cross-continental reversal of sexual size dimorphism in Sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae).
Puniamoorthy N; Blanckenhorn WU; Schäfer MA
J Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2253-63. PubMed ID: 22984945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos.
McGlothlin JW; Parker PG; Nolan V; Ketterson ED
Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):658-71. PubMed ID: 15856707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Migrate small, sound big: functional constraints on body size promote tracheal elongation in cranes.
Jones MR; Witt CC
J Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 27(6):1256-64. PubMed ID: 24800977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids.
Bro-Jørgensen J
Evolution; 2007 Jun; 61(6):1316-26. PubMed ID: 17542842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The quantitative genetics of sexually selected traits, preferred traits and preference: a review and analysis of the data.
Prokuda AY; Roff DA
J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2283-96. PubMed ID: 25263742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
