These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24411026)
1. Is more radical more effective? Yen MS; Ng HT; Wang PH Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 52(4):463-4. PubMed ID: 24411026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is conization once following by simple hysterectomy sufficient for all clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma? Chen JR; Chiu ML; Wang TY; Chen TC; Wang KG; Su TH; Chang CL; Yang YC; Wang KL Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 52(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 24075378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety of less aggressive surgery for stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Lee JY; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24689464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Indications for therapeutic conization and for total hysterectomy in presence of an epithelioma of te cervix]. PHILIPPE E; RENAUD R Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr; 1962; 14():63-7. PubMed ID: 14486198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1). He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and pathological findings of initial conization. Yoshinaga M; Hamada T; Orita Y; Yoshitomi Shintomo N; Matsuo T; Tsuji T; Tabata K; Douchi T J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1645-9. PubMed ID: 21790884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sarcomatoid squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix successfully treated by laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a case report. Kong TW; Kim JH; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Ryu HS; Joo HJ J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(9-10):445-8. PubMed ID: 21043374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for borderline lesions of the uterine cervix]. Matsuyama T; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Iwasaka T; Saito T; Uchino H; Nakano H; Matsukuma K Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Nov; 36(11):2063-71. PubMed ID: 6512325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Muntz HG; Bell DA; Lage JM; Goff BA; Feldman S; Rice LW Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Dec; 80(6):935-9. PubMed ID: 1448263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case of successful perinatal outcome and management of microinvasive cervical cancer diagnosed in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Lee SP; Kim SY; Park HN; Shin JW J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):200-1. PubMed ID: 25244300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conization of the uterine cervix: two different surgical techniques. Iodice F; Tramontana S; Casella G; Tramontana R; Fortuna G; Germano A J Chemother; 1997 Apr; 9(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 9176759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality. Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A case of parametrial lymph node involvement in stage IA2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix treated with radical hysterectomy and a review of the literature: a case report. Billingsley CC; Kohler MF; Creasman WT; Madory JE; Young JL J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Apr; 16(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 22227838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of a continuous series of 34 young patients with early-stage cervical cancer selected for a vaginal radical trachelectomy: should "staging" conization be systematically performed before this procedure? Uzan C; Gouy S; Desroque D; Pomel C; Duvillard P; Balleyguier C; Haie-Meder C; Morice P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Feb; 23(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 23358180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical hysterectomy: influence of recent conization on morbidity and complications. Webb MJ; Symmonds RE Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Mar; 53(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 424099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical carcinoma in situ-the role of radical conization. KRIEGER JS; MCCORMACK J Postgrad Med J; 1960 Jan; 27():99-103. PubMed ID: 14411997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical conization as definitive therapy for early invasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Morris M; Mitchell MF; Silva EG; Copeland LJ; Gershenson DM Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Nov; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 8276293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for tumor recurrence after radical hysterectomy for stage IB squamous cancer of cervix. Nuss RC; Benrubi G; Hazlett W J Fla Med Assoc; 1985 Sep; 72(9):768-70. PubMed ID: 4067569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conservative treatment of stage IA2 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy. Ben-Arie A; Levy R; Lavie O; Edwards C; Kaplan A Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 104(5 Pt 2):1129-31. PubMed ID: 15516424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]