276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24411426)
1. Face, content, and construct validity of a novel portable ergonomic simulator for basic laparoscopic skills.
Xiao D; Jakimowicz JJ; Albayrak A; Buzink SN; Botden SM; Goossens RH
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 24411426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A newly designed portable ergonomic laparoscopic skills Ergo-Lap simulator.
Xiao D; Albayrak A; Jakimowicz JJ; Goossens RH
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2013 Dec; 22(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 23992382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face validation of a portable ergonomic laparoscopy skills simulator for single-incision laparoscopic surgery training.
Xiao DJ; Albayrak A; Buzink SN; Jakimowicz JJ; Goossens RH
Surg Technol Int; 2014 Mar; 24():19-25. PubMed ID: 24526423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a novel basic virtual reality simulator, the LAP-X, for training basic laparoscopic skills.
Kawaguchi K; Egi H; Hattori M; Sawada H; Suzuki T; Ohdan H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2014 Oct; 23(5):287-93. PubMed ID: 24773373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new virtual-reality training module for laparoscopic surgical skills and equipment handling: can multitasking be trained? A randomized controlled trial.
Bongers PJ; Diederick van Hove P; Stassen LP; Dankelman J; Schreuder HW
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 25439179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Face, Content, and Construct Validity of the Take-Home EoSim Augmented Reality Laparoscopy Simulator for Basic Laparoscopic Tasks.
Arts EEA; Leijte E; Witteman BPL; Jakimowicz JJ; Verhoeven B; Botden SMBI
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Nov; 29(11):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 31613679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The EZ Trainer: validation of a portable and inexpensive simulator for training basic laparoscopic skills.
Hruby GW; Sprenkle PC; Abdelshehid C; Clayman RV; McDougall EM; Landman J
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):662-6. PubMed ID: 18082210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a thoracoscopic lobectomy simulator.
Tong BC; Gustafson MR; Balderson SS; D'Amico TA; Meyerson SL
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2012 Aug; 42(2):364-9; discussion 369. PubMed ID: 22315356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Basic laparoscopic training using the Simbionix LAP Mentor: setting the standards in the novice group.
von Websky MW; Vitz M; Raptis DA; Rosenthal R; Clavien PA; Hahnloser D
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 22677582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychomotor skills and cognitive load training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator for tubal surgery is effective.
Bharathan R; Vali S; Setchell T; Miskry T; Darzi A; Aggarwal R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 23608628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An "intermediate curriculum" for advanced laparoscopic skills training with virtual reality simulation.
Schreuder HW; van Hove PD; Janse JA; Verheijen RR; Stassen LP; Dankelman J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 21783431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.
Thinggaard E
Dan Med J; 2017 Apr; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 28385174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective differentiation of force-based laparoscopic skills using a novel haptic simulator.
Singapogu RB; Smith DE; Long LO; Burg TC; Pagano CC; Burg KJ
J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(6):766-73. PubMed ID: 23111044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Cheung CL; Looi T; Lendvay TS; Drake JM; Farhat WA
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 24776857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing the minimal number of virtual reality simulator training sessions necessary to develop basic laparoscopic skills competence: evaluation of the learning curve.
Duarte RJ; Cury J; Oliveira LC; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):712-9. PubMed ID: 24267114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks.
Leijte E; Arts E; Witteman B; Jakimowicz J; De Blaauw I; Botden S
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3635-3643. PubMed ID: 30671668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
