278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24411426)
21. [Preliminary validation of the Simulap(®) physical simulator and its assessment system for laparoscopic surgery].
Enciso Sanz S; Sánchez Margallo FM; Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugués I; Usón Gargallo J
Cir Esp; 2012 Jan; 90(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 22078308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. LAParoscopic simulator for pediatric ureteral reimplantation (LAP-SPUR) following the Lich-Gregoir technique.
Millán C; Rey M; Lopez M
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29428359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery skills curriculum.
Sweet RM; Beach R; Sainfort F; Gupta P; Reihsen T; Poniatowski LH; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2012 Feb; 26(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 22050489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.
McNatt SS; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 11727075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19088648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Manual laparoscopic skills development using a low-cost trainer box in Tanzania.
Beard JH; Akoko L; Mwanga A; Mkony C; O'Sullivan P
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 24411429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Construct and face validity of a virtual reality-based camera navigation curriculum.
Shetty S; Panait L; Baranoski J; Dudrick SJ; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 177(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 22739048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator.
Brewin J; Nedas T; Challacombe B; Elhage O; Keisu J; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 20128776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills in Veterinarians Using a Canine Laparoscopic Simulator.
Tapia-Araya AE; Usón-Gargallo J; Enciso S; Pérez-Duarte FJ; Díaz-Güemes Martin-Portugués I; Fresno-Bermejo L; Sánchez-Margallo FM
J Vet Med Educ; 2016; 43(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 26653288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can the learning of laparoscopic skills be quantified by the measurements of skill parameters performed in a virtual reality simulator?
Sandy NS; Cruz JA; Passerotti CC; Nguyen H; Reis ST; Gouveia EM; Duarte RJ; Bruschini H; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 23849568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux simulator curriculum as an effective teaching tool: Pilot study.
Soltani T; Hidas G; Kelly MS; Kaplan A; Selby B; Billimek J; Wehbi E; McDougall E; McAleer I; McLorie G; Khoury AE
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Feb; 12(1):45.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26350643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Face validation of the Simbionix LAP Mentor virtual reality training module and its applicability in the surgical curriculum.
Ayodeji ID; Schijven M; Jakimowicz J; Greve JW
Surg Endosc; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1641-9. PubMed ID: 17356944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of procedural skills using virtual simulation remains a challenge.
Van Bruwaene S; Schijven MP; Miserez M
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):654-61. PubMed ID: 24776871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Face and construct validity of virtual reality simulation of laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
Schreuder HW; van Dongen KW; Roeleveld SJ; Schijven MP; Broeders IA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 200(5):540.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19285646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ergonomic factors on task performance in laparoscopic surgery training.
Xiao DJ; Jakimowicz JJ; Albayrak A; Goossens RH
Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):548-53. PubMed ID: 21893312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic skills training using inexpensive box trainers: which exercises to choose when constructing a validated training course.
Schreuder HW; van den Berg CB; Hazebroek EJ; Verheijen RH; Schijven MP
BJOG; 2011 Dec; 118(13):1576-84. PubMed ID: 21981275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for gynecology residents.
Kirby TO; Numnum TM; Kilgore LC; Straughn JM
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Feb; 206(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 18222390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of single incision laparoscopic surgery "low-fidelity" simulation training.
Frigenza M; Tran A; Breaud J; Fournier JP; Bongain A; Delotte J
J Visc Surg; 2014 Oct; 151(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 25214433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of a novel iPad-based laparoscopic trainer and comparison with a standard laparoscopic trainer for basic laparoscopic skills testing.
Yoon R; Del Junco M; Kaplan A; Okhunov Z; Bucur P; Hofmann M; Alipanah R; McDougall EM; Landman J
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 25052844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
