276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24411426)
41. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Development and evaluation of a canine laparoscopic simulator for veterinary clinical training.
Usón-Gargallo J; Tapia-Araya AE; Díaz-Güemes Martin-Portugués I; Sánchez-Margallo FM
J Vet Med Educ; 2014; 41(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 25000884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accelerometer Measurement of Head Movement During Laparoscopic Surgery as a Tool to Evaluate Skill Development of Surgeons.
Viriyasiripong S; Lopez A; Mandava SH; Lai WR; Mitchell GC; Boonjindasup A; Powers MK; Silberstein JL; Lee BR
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 26923103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Construct validity for eye-hand coordination skill on a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator.
Yamaguchi S; Konishi K; Yasunaga T; Yoshida D; Kinjo N; Kobayashi K; Ieiri S; Okazaki K; Nakashima H; Tanoue K; Maehara Y; Hashizume M
Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2253-7. PubMed ID: 17479319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The role of simulator Promis2 in learning laparoscopic skill.
Shrestha SK; Nomura T; Tajiri T; Akagi I; Aso R; Miyashita M; Yoshimura A; Shimura T
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2009; 48(175):221-5. PubMed ID: 20795461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Stratification of Expert vs Novice Laparoscopists Using the Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery (BLUS) Curriculum at a Single Institution.
Mandava SH; Liu J; Maddox MM; Woodson B; Thomas R; Lee BR
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(5):964-8. PubMed ID: 25911459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hybrid augmented reality simulator: preliminary construct validation of laparoscopic smoothness in a urology residency program.
Feifer A; Delisle J; Anidjar M
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18710760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Face, content, and construct validity of the EndoViS training system for objective assessment of psychomotor skills of laparoscopic surgeons.
Escamirosa FP; Flores RM; García IO; Vidal CR; Martínez AM
Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3392-403. PubMed ID: 25515985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessment of laparoscopic skills before and after simulation training with a canine abdominal model.
Fransson BA; Ragle CA
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2010 May; 236(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 20470069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of validity evidence for the RobotiX robot assisted surgery simulator on advanced suturing tasks.
Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Rosman C; Botden SMBI
BMC Surg; 2020 Aug; 20(1):183. PubMed ID: 32787831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study.
Hung AJ; Patil MB; Zehnder P; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):630-7. PubMed ID: 22177176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.
Fried GM; Feldman LS; Vassiliou MC; Fraser SA; Stanbridge D; Ghitulescu G; Andrew CG
Ann Surg; 2004 Sep; 240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8. PubMed ID: 15319723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Training of basic laparoscopy skills on SimSurgery SEP.
Buzink SN; Goossens RH; De Ridder H; Jakimowicz JJ
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2010; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20095896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score.
Bellorin O; Kundel A; Sharma S; Ramirez-Valderrama A; Lee P
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3654-60. PubMed ID: 26514134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.
Kenney PA; Wszolek MF; Gould JJ; Libertino JA; Moinzadeh A
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1288-92. PubMed ID: 19362352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology.
Dauster B; Steinberg AP; Vassiliou MC; Bergman S; Stanbridge DD; Feldman LS; Fried GM
J Endourol; 2005 Jun; 19(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 15989441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Multi-Institutional Validation of Fundamental Inanimate Robotic Skills Tasks.
Goh AC; Aghazadeh MA; Mercado MA; Hung AJ; Pan MM; Desai MM; Gill IS; Dunkin BJ
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1751-6. PubMed ID: 26196733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Objective assessment of skills acquisition during laparoscopic surgery courses.
Sarker SJ; Telfah MM; Onuba L; Patel BP
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):530-8. PubMed ID: 23242519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
