161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24411522)
1. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners.
Lettau M; Kotter E; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2014 Oct; 41(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 24411522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents-does stent orientation matter?
Lettau M; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
Neuroradiology; 2013 Jun; 55(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23411716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angiographic CT: in vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents using two different angiography systems.
Lettau M; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
J Neuroradiol; 2013 Dec; 40(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 23660542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of different carotid artery stents: a pixel-by-pixel analysis using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Reinhardt J; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
Neuroradiology; 2010 Sep; 52(9):823-30. PubMed ID: 19924409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stents: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using CT angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5T and 3T.
Lettau M; Sauer A; Heiland S; Rohde S; Bendszus M; Hähnel S
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1993-7. PubMed ID: 19749216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of middle cerebral artery stents using multidetector row CT angiography in vivo study: comparison of the three different kernels.
Jang JH; Lim YS; Lee YJ; Yoo WJ; Sung MS; Kim BS
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 22393160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of vertebral artery stents using 16-slice multi-detector row CT angiography in vivo evaluation: comparison of a medium-smooth kernel and a sharp kernel.
Yoo WJ; Lim YS; Ahn KJ; Choi BG; Kim JY; Kim SH
Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 18359179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification and detectability of in-stent stenosis with CT angiography and MR angiography in arterial stents in vitro.
Blum MB; Schmook M; Schernthaner R; Edelhauser G; Puchner S; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1238-42. PubMed ID: 17954666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small-vessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography.
Hähnel S; Trossbach M; Braun C; Heiland S; Knauth M; Sartor K; Hartmann M
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Sep; 24(8):1512-6. PubMed ID: 13679261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptibility and quantification of in-stent stenosis with six peripheral arterial stent types in vitro: comparison of 16-MDCT angiography, 64-MDCT angiography, and MR angiography.
Schernthaner MB; Edelhauser G; Berzaczy D; Schernthaner R; Wolf F; Lammer J; Funovics MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1346-51. PubMed ID: 20410424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT.
Maintz D; Burg MC; Seifarth H; Bunck AC; Ozgün M; Fischbach R; Jürgens KU; Heindel W
Eur Radiol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 18682956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?
Wolf F; Feuchtner GM; Homolka P; Langenberger H; Stadler A; Bader TR; Weber M; Lammer J; Loewe C
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):465-70. PubMed ID: 17913428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of peripheral artery stent with 64-slice multi-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Li XM; Li YH; Tian JM; Xiao Y; Lu JP; Jing ZP; Sheng J; Edwin A; Wu FH
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 19376662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT angiographic appearance of in-stent restenosis of intracranial arteries treated with the Wingspan stent.
Turk AS; Rowley HA; Niemann DB; Fiorella D; Aagaard-Kienitz B; Pulfer K; Strother CM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Oct; 28(9):1752-4. PubMed ID: 17893212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.
Schuijf JD; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Tuinenburg JC; van der Hoeven BL; de Roos A; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 17890353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3.0 Tesla contrast-enhanced MR angiography of carotid artery stents: in vitro measurements as compared with 1.5 Tesla.
Hähnel S; Nguyen-Trong TH; Rohde S; Hartmann M; Braun C; Sartor K; Heiland S
J Neuroradiol; 2006 Apr; 33(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16733419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience.
Seifarth H; Ozgün M; Raupach R; Flohr T; Heindel W; Fischbach R; Maintz D
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jan; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 16355036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography.
Nolz R; Wibmer A; Beitzke D; Gentzsch S; Willfort-Ehringer A; Lammer J; Thurnher M; Schoder M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 21211920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
