These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24411994)
1. Properties of axially loaded implant-abutment assemblies using digital holographic interferometry analysis. Brozović J; Demoli N; Farkaš N; Sušić M; Alar Z; Gabrić Pandurić D Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):e17-27. PubMed ID: 24411994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of Force Transmission on Narrow-Body Dental Implants Made of Commercially Pure Titanium and Titanium Zirconia Alloy with a Conical Implant-Abutment Connection: An Experimental Pilot Study. Nelson K; Schmelzeisen R; Taylor TD; Zabler S; Wiest W; Fretwurst T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 27632261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging. Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study. Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants. Dittmer S; Dittmer MP; Kohorst P; Jendras M; Borchers L; Stiesch M J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):510-6. PubMed ID: 21910778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Axial Loading on the Pull-out Force of Conical Connection Abutments in Ankylos Implant. Hsu PF; Yao KT; Kao HC; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):788-794. PubMed ID: 30024994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections. Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-abutment interface: a comparison of the ultimate force to failure among narrow-diameter implant systems. Imam AY; Moshaverinia A; McGlumphy EA J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 24725612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study. Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area. Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections. Asvanund P; Morgano SM J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation. Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deformation of implant abutments after framework connection using strain gauges. Hollweg H; Jacques LB; da Silva Moura M; Bianco VC; Souza EA; Rubo JH J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 22568468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of two full-arch rehabilitations supported by four or five implants. Francetti L; Cavalli N; Villa T; La Barbera L; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Del Fabbro M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 25830403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]