464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24412119)
1. Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention.
McAlpine JN; Hanley GE; Woo MM; Tone AA; Rozenberg N; Swenerton KD; Gilks CB; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller DM;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):471.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24412119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extending the safety evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy in prevention of ovarian cancer: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; Finlayson SJ; Huntsman DG; Miller D; McAlpine JN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):172.e1-172.e8. PubMed ID: 29852159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; McAlpine JN; Huntsman DG; Finlayson SJ; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):221.e1-221.e11. PubMed ID: 32067967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance and safety of bilateral salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in the United States.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Pearce CL; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 216(3):270.e1-270.e9. PubMed ID: 27810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
Falconer H; Yin L; Grönberg H; Altman D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Feb; 107(2):. PubMed ID: 25628372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774 Summary: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):842-843. PubMed ID: 30913193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No. 344-Opportunistic Salpingectomy and Other Methods of Risk Reduction for Ovarian/Fallopian Tube/Peritoneal Cancer in the General Population.
Salvador S; Scott S; Francis JA; Agrawal A; Giede C
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Jun; 39(6):480-493. PubMed ID: 28527613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 133(4):e279-e284. PubMed ID: 30913199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risks and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy: a decision analysis.
Cadish LA; Shepherd JP; Barber EL; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):603.e1-603.e6. PubMed ID: 28619689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of opportunistic salpingectomy on ovarian cancer mortality and healthcare costs: a call for universal insurance coverage.
Naumann RW; Hughes BN; Brown J; Drury LK; Herzog TJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):397.e1-397.e6. PubMed ID: 33798477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Use of Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy.
Till SR; Kobernik EK; Kamdar NS; Edwards MG; As-Sanie S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 28712794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy vs Tubal Occlusion or Ligation for Ovarian Cancer Prophylaxis.
Ely LK; Truong M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):371-378. PubMed ID: 28087480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.
Rufin KGA; do Valle HA; McAlpine JN; Elwood C; Hanley GE
Fertil Steril; 2024 Mar; 121(3):531-539. PubMed ID: 38043843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.
Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011.
Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Mogos MF; Hart S; Salihu HM; Imudia AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):713.e1-13. PubMed ID: 25935772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dilley SE; Havrilesky LJ; Bakkum-Gamez J; Cohn DE; Michael Straughn J; Caughey AB; Rodriguez MI
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Aug; 146(2):373-379. PubMed ID: 28577884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current surgical practice of prophylactic and opportunistic salpingectomy in France].
Chene G; de Rochambeau B; Le Bail-Carval K; Beaufils E; Chabert P; Mellier G; Lamblin G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016; 44(7-8):377-84. PubMed ID: 27363615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention.
Hanley GE; McAlpine JN; Kwon JS; Mitchell G
Gynecol Oncol Res Pract; 2015; 2():5. PubMed ID: 27231565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
