These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24413274)

  • 21. Marked dissociation of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity even in normal observers.
    Hertenstein H; Bach M; Gross NJ; Beisse F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 25921390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability and validity of the Melbourne Edge Test and High/Low Contrast Visual Acuity chart.
    Haymes SA; Chen J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):308-16. PubMed ID: 15181355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contrast reduction and reading: assessment and reliability with the Reading Explorer test.
    Giacomelli G; Volpe R; Virgili G; Farini A; Arrighi R; Tarli-Barbieri C; Mencucci R; Menchini U
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 19882511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.
    Kiser AK; Mladenovich D; Eshraghi F; Bourdeau D; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):946-54. PubMed ID: 16317369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart.
    Elliott DB; Sanderson K; Conkey A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Normative values for a tablet computer-based application to assess chromatic contrast sensitivity.
    Bodduluri L; Boon MY; Ryan M; Dain SJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):673-683. PubMed ID: 28411334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Designing a new test for contrast sensitivity function measurement with iPad.
    Rodríguez-Vallejo M; Remón L; Monsoriu JA; Furlan WD
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 25890826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mobile app Aston contrast sensitivity test.
    Kingsnorth A; Drew T; Grewal B; Wolffsohn JS
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jul; 99(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 27291146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in Zaire.
    Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo D; Spileers W; Missotten L
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1996; 263():87-90. PubMed ID: 9396193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EVALUATING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION USING A NOVEL COMPUTER-BASED TEST, THE SPAETH/RICHMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY TEST.
    Faria BM; Duman F; Zheng CX; Waisbourd M; Gupta L; Ali M; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Richman J; Spaeth GL
    Retina; 2015 Jul; 35(7):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25658175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing performance on the MNREAD iPad application with the MNREAD acuity chart.
    Calabrèse A; To L; He Y; Berkholtz E; Rafian P; Legge GE
    J Vis; 2018 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 29351351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of an Automated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Low-contrast Letter Acuity Test.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E; Wang J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):370-376. PubMed ID: 32413009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual acuity testing.
    Zhang ZT; Zhang SC; Huang XG; Liang LY
    J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Jan; 19(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 23434538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical and microperimetric predictors of reading speed in low vision patients: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Giacomelli G; Virgili G; Giansanti F; Sato G; Cappello E; Cruciani F; Varano M; Menchini U
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):4403-8. PubMed ID: 23722392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test.
    Rabin J; Wicks J
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 73(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 8807651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Tablet-Based Tests of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Older Adults.
    Varadaraj V; Assi L; Gajwani P; Wahl M; David J; Swenor BK; Ehrlich JR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 28(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 33185485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity test (SPARCS): design, reproducibility and ability to identify patients with glaucoma.
    Richman J; Zangalli C; Lu L; Wizov SS; Spaeth E; Spaeth GL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 25053760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.