161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2441374)
1. Rate-responsive pacing by means of activity sensing versus single rate ventricular pacing: a double-blind cross-over study.
Smedgård P; Kristensson BE; Kruse I; Ryden L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jul; 10(4 Pt 1):902-15. PubMed ID: 2441374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing. A study based upon assessment of exercise tolerance.
Kaul U; Sundar AS; Bhatia ML
J Assoc Physicians India; 1989 May; 37(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the work capacity and relationship between rate response and exercise tolerance associated with activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing.
Faerestrand S; Breivik K; Ohm OJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Nov; 10(6):1277-90. PubMed ID: 2446275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomised crossover trial of rate responsive Activitrax and conventional fixed rate ventricular pacing.
Lipkin DP; Buller N; Frenneaux M; Ludgate L; Lowe T; Webb SC; Krikler DM
Br Heart J; 1987 Dec; 58(6):613-6. PubMed ID: 3322351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefit of single setting rate responsive ventricular pacing compared with fixed rate demand pacing in elderly patients.
Gammage M; Schofield S; Rankin I; Bennett M; Coles P; Pentecost B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):174-80. PubMed ID: 1706502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers.
Osswald S; Leiggener C; Buser PT; Pfisterer ME; Burckhardt D; Burkart F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 19(6):890-8. PubMed ID: 8774818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of ventricular rate responsive pacing in children with complete atrioventricular block.
Ragonese P; Guccione P; Drago F; Turchetta A; Calzolari A; Formigari R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):603-10. PubMed ID: 7516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activity-sensing rate responsive versus conventional fixed-rate pacing: a comparison of rate behavior and patient well-being during routine daily exercise.
Candinas RA; Gloor HO; Amann FW; Schoenbeck M; Turina M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb; 14(2 Pt 1):204-13. PubMed ID: 1706506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Holter-monitored heart rhythm during atrioventricular synchronous and fixed-rate ventricular pacing.
Kristensson BE; Karlsson O; Rydén L
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1986 Jul; 9(4):511-8. PubMed ID: 2426669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations of rate response of an activity-sensing rate-responsive pacemaker to different forms of activity.
Lau CP; Mehta D; Toff WD; Stott RJ; Ward DE; Camm AJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Feb; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 2451223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate responsive pacing using the evoked QT principle. A physiological alternative to atrial synchronous pacemakers.
Donaldson RM; Rickards AF
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1983 Nov; 6(6):1344-9. PubMed ID: 6196745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior cardiac hemodynamics of atrioventricular synchrony over rate responsive pacing at submaximal exercise: observations in activity sensing DDDR pacemakers.
Lau CP; Wong CK; Leung WH; Liu WX
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):1832-7. PubMed ID: 1704550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview.
Sukhum P
Postgrad Med; 1986 Mar; 79(4):173-4, 177-83, 186-8. PubMed ID: 3952041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiologic pacing in the elderly. Effects on exercise capacity and exercise-induced arrhythmias.
Jordaens L; de Backer G; Clement DL
Jpn Heart J; 1988 Jan; 29(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3398242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.
Oldroyd KG; Rae AP; Carter R; Wingate C; Cobbe SM
Br Heart J; 1991 Apr; 65(4):188-93. PubMed ID: 1827588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
