These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24414194)
1. Comodulation masking release in electric hearing. Pierzycki RH; Seeber BU J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 24414194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comodulation masking release as a function of level. Moore BC; Shailer MJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):829-35. PubMed ID: 1939887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comodulation masking release as a function of type of signal, gated or continuous masking, monaural or dichotic presentation of flanking bands, and center frequency. Fantini DA; Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2106-15. PubMed ID: 8473623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release. Goldman SA; Baer T; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3181-93. PubMed ID: 21568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of frequency selectivity on comodulation masking release in normal-hearing listeners. Hall JW; Grose JH; Moore BC J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):410-23. PubMed ID: 8487531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comodulation masking release with random variations of flanking-band center frequencies. Doleschal F; Verhey JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):692. PubMed ID: 32873023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):262-72. PubMed ID: 2921408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers. Zirn S; Hempel JM; Schuster M; Hemmert W Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():60-6. PubMed ID: 23220120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indications for temporal fine structure contribution to co-modulation masking release. Pierzycki RH; Seeber BU J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3614-24. PubMed ID: 21218893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can comodulation masking release occur when frequency changes could promote perceptual segregation of the on-frequency and flanking bands? Verhey JL; Epp B; Stasiak A; Winter IM Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():475-82. PubMed ID: 23716254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners. Chatterjee M; Oba SI J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Dec; 5(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 15675001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release. Buss E; Grose JH; Hall JW J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 19894826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm. Klink KB; Dierker H; Beutelmann R; Klump GM J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 19763691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling within- and across-channel processes in comodulation masking release. Dau T; Piechowiak T; Ewert SD J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):350-64. PubMed ID: 23297908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of the selective disruption of within- and across-channel cues to comodulation masking release. Goldman SA; Baer T; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2866-73. PubMed ID: 22087915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Signal detection in temporally modulated and spectrally shaped maskers. van den Brink WA; Houtgast T; Smoorenburg GF J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):267-78. PubMed ID: 1737877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing. Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing. Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]