These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24415749)

  • 1. Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores.
    Doi SA
    Clin Med Res; 2014 Sep; 12(1-2):40-6. PubMed ID: 24415749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is it time for the Cochrane Collaboration to reconsider its meta-analysis methodology?
    Onitilo AA
    Clin Med Res; 2014 Sep; 12(1-2):2-3. PubMed ID: 24573703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.
    Greenland S; O'Rourke K
    Biostatistics; 2001 Dec; 2(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 12933636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [How to assess the quality of systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Zhang JH; Shang HC; Zhang BL
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Apr; 6(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 18405597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
    Glenny AM; Altman DG; Song F; Sakarovitch C; Deeks JJ; D'Amico R; Bradburn M; Eastwood AJ;
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Jul; 9(26):1-134, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-Based Decision-Making 2: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Bello A; Vandermeer B; Wiebe N; Garg AX; Tonelli M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():405-428. PubMed ID: 33871856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pro: Meta-analysis: the case for.
    Mudge DW; Webster AC; Johnson DW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2016 Jun; 31(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 27217392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Onitilo AA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):653-7. PubMed ID: 22845171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incorporating uncertainty regarding applicability of evidence from meta-analyses into clinical decision making.
    Kriston L; Meister R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 24332396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Methodology for Conducting Systematic Reviews for the Evidence Analysis Library.
    Handu D; Moloney L; Wolfram T; Ziegler P; Acosta A; Steiber A
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Feb; 116(2):311-318. PubMed ID: 26822985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential biases in accumulating evidence.
    Kulinskaya E; Huggins R; Dogo SH
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):294-305. PubMed ID: 26626562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of Data Integration Technologies With Intensive Care Clinician Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lin YL; Trbovich P; Kolodzey L; Nickel C; Guerguerian AM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 May; 2(5):e194392. PubMed ID: 31125104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of meta-analysis in medical decision making.
    Von Korff M
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):329-30. PubMed ID: 14588942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.
    Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):462-9. PubMed ID: 10481815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.