154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24416180)
1. Modeling fence location and density at a regional scale for use in wildlife management.
Poor EE; Jakes A; Loucks C; Suitor M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e83912. PubMed ID: 24416180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing habitat suitability and connectivity modeling methods for conserving pronghorn migrations.
Poor EE; Loucks C; Jakes A; Urban DL
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49390. PubMed ID: 23166656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-scale habitat assessment of pronghorn migration routes.
Jakes AF; DeCesare NJ; Jones PF; Gates CC; Story SJ; Olimb SK; Kunkel KE; Hebblewhite M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241042. PubMed ID: 33275623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying impediments to long-distance mammal migrations.
Seidler RG; Long RA; Berger J; Bergen S; Beckmann JP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 25158993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Animal use of fence crossings in southwestern rangelands.
Zoromski LD; DeYoung RW; Goolsby JA; Foley AM; Ortega-Santos JA; Hewitt DG; Campbell TA
Ecol Evol; 2022 Oct; 12(10):e9376. PubMed ID: 36203632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An adaptive plan for prioritizing road sections for fencing to reduce animal mortality.
Spanowicz AG; Teixeira FZ; Jaeger JAG
Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1210-1220. PubMed ID: 32227646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is it the road or the fence? Influence of linear anthropogenic features on the movement and distribution of a partially migratory ungulate.
Jones PF; Jakes AF; Vegter SE; Verhage MS
Mov Ecol; 2022 Aug; 10(1):37. PubMed ID: 36038930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A ghost fence-gap: surprising wildlife usage of an obsolete fence crossing.
Dupuis-Desormeaux M; Kaaria TN; Mwololo M; Davidson Z; MacDonald SE
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5950. PubMed ID: 30515359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of large-scale gold mining on habitat use and selection by American pronghorn.
Osterhout MJ; Stewart KM; Wakeling BF; Schroeder CA; Blum ME; Brockman JC; Shoemaker KT
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Apr; 921():170750. PubMed ID: 38336073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assumptions about fence permeability influence density estimates for brown hyaenas across South Africa.
Williams KS; Williams ST; Welch RJ; Marneweck CJ; Mann GKH; Pitman RT; Whittington-Jones G; Balme GA; Parker DM; Hill RA
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):620. PubMed ID: 33436644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impacts of exclusion fencing on target and non-target fauna: a global review.
Smith D; King R; Allen BL
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Dec; 95(6):1590-1606. PubMed ID: 32725786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring the internal and external wildlife gradients created by conservation fences.
Moseby KE; McGregor H; Hill BM; Read JL
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):220-231. PubMed ID: 31310356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Border Security Fencing and Wildlife: The End of the Transboundary Paradigm in Eurasia?
Linnell JD; Trouwborst A; Boitani L; Kaczensky P; Huber D; Reljic S; Kusak J; Majic A; Skrbinsek T; Potocnik H; Hayward MW; Milner-Gulland EJ; Buuveibaatar B; Olson KA; Badamjav L; Bischof R; Zuther S; Breitenmoser U
PLoS Biol; 2016 Jun; 14(6):e1002483. PubMed ID: 27331878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of mitigation on sage-grouse habitat selection within an energy development field.
Fedy BC; Kirol CP; Sutphin AL; Maechtle TL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121603. PubMed ID: 25835296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of environmental change, harvest exposure, and human disturbance on population trends of greater sage-grouse.
Dinkins JB; Lawson KJ; Beck JL
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257198. PubMed ID: 34559848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the apparent failure of silt fences to protect freshwater ecosystems from sedimentation: A call for improvements in science, technology, training and compliance monitoring.
Cooke SJ; Chapman JM; Vermaire JC
J Environ Manage; 2015 Dec; 164():67-73. PubMed ID: 26342269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing mammal fence crossing and local fence management in relation to classical swine fever spread in Japan.
Suzuki T; Ikeda T; Higashide D; Nose T; Shichijo T; Suzuki M
Prev Vet Med; 2023 Sep; 218():105980. PubMed ID: 37549564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fencing amplifies individual differences in movement with implications on survival for two migratory ungulates.
Xu W; Gigliotti LC; Royauté R; Sawyer H; Middleton AD
J Anim Ecol; 2023 Mar; 92(3):677-689. PubMed ID: 36598334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring artificial habitat fragmentation to control invasion by infectious wildlife diseases.
Bozzuto C; Canessa S; Koella JC
Theor Popul Biol; 2021 Oct; 141():14-23. PubMed ID: 34139201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of electric power lines on the breeding ecology of greater sage-grouse.
Kohl MT; Messmer TA; Crabb BA; Guttery MR; Dahlgren DK; Larsen RT; Frey SN; Liguori S; Baxter RJ
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209968. PubMed ID: 30699130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
