These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24416195)

  • 1. Depth perception not found in human observers for static or dynamic anti-correlated random dot stereograms.
    Hibbard PB; Scott-Brown KC; Haigh EC; Adrain M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84087. PubMed ID: 24416195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurons in Striate Cortex Signal Disparity in Half-Matched Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Read JC; Cumming BG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(34):8967-76. PubMed ID: 27559177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
    Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First- and second-order contributions to depth perception in anti-correlated random dot stereograms.
    Asher JM; Hibbard PB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14120. PubMed ID: 30237535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients.
    Watanabe Y; Kezuka T; Harasawa K; Usui M; Yaguchi H; Shioiri S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17596334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-reversed binocular dot-pairs in random-dot stereograms for depth perception in central visual field: Probing the dynamics of feedforward-feedback processes in visual inference.
    Zhaoping L
    Vision Res; 2021 Sep; 186():124-139. PubMed ID: 34091397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust natural depth for anticorrelated random dot stereogram for edge stimuli, but minimal reversed depth for embedded circular stimuli, irrespective of eccentricity.
    Hibbard PB; Asher JM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274566. PubMed ID: 36137132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth.
    Tanabe S; Yasuoka S; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivoxel pattern selectivity for perceptually relevant binocular disparities in the human brain.
    Preston TJ; Li S; Kourtzi Z; Welchman AE
    J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(44):11315-27. PubMed ID: 18971473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Associated phoria in relation to stereopsis with random-dot stereograms.
    Jiménez JR; Olivares JL; Pérez-Ocón F; del Barco LJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jan; 77(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10654858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.
    Becker S; Bowd C; Shorter S; King K; Patterson R
    Vision Res; 1999 Jan; 39(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 10326139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disparity detection in anticorrelated stereograms.
    Cumming BG; Shapiro SE; Parker AJ
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1367-77. PubMed ID: 10505181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recovery of stereopsis through perceptual learning in human adults with abnormal binocular vision.
    Ding J; Levi DM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Sep; 108(37):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21896742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A specialization for relative disparity in V2.
    Thomas OM; Cumming BG; Parker AJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 May; 5(5):472-8. PubMed ID: 11967544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of decorrelation on 3-D grating detection with static and dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Palmisano S; Allison RS; Howard IP
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 16307771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4.
    Tanabe S; Doi T; Umeda K; Fujita I
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 94(4):2683-99. PubMed ID: 16000525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A relative frame of reference underlies reversed depth perception in anticorrelated random-dot stereograms.
    Aoki SC; Shiozaki HM; Fujita I
    J Vis; 2017 Oct; 17(12):17. PubMed ID: 29071354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.