These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24416405)

  • 1. Discrimination of ultrasonic vocalizations by CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus) is related to spectrotemporal dissimilarity of vocalizations.
    Neilans EG; Holfoth DP; Radziwon KE; Portfors CV; Dent ML
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85405. PubMed ID: 24416405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain.
    Holmstrom LA; Eeuwes LB; Roberts PD; Portfors CV
    J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 30(3):802-19. PubMed ID: 20089889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency difference limens and auditory cue trading in CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).
    Radziwon KE; Dent ML
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jul; 106():74-6. PubMed ID: 24811450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of aging and sex on detection of ultrasonic vocalizations by adult CBA/CaJ mice (Mus musculus).
    Kobrina A; Dent ML
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():119-129. PubMed ID: 27579993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mismatch of structural and functional tonotopy for natural sounds in the auditory midbrain.
    Portfors CV; Roberts PD
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():192-203. PubMed ID: 24252321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural Vocalizations in the Mammalian Inferior Colliculus are Broadly Encoded by a Small Number of Independent Multi-Units.
    Lyzwa D; Herrmann JM; Wörgötter F
    Front Neural Circuits; 2015; 9():91. PubMed ID: 26869890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Over-representation of species-specific vocalizations in the awake mouse inferior colliculus.
    Portfors CV; Roberts PD; Jonson K
    Neuroscience; 2009 Aug; 162(2):486-500. PubMed ID: 19401221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Best sensitivity of temporal modulation transfer functions in laboratory mice matches the amplitude modulation embedded in vocalizations.
    Cai H; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):337. PubMed ID: 32006990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CBA/CaJ mouse ultrasonic vocalizations depend on prior social experience.
    Burke K; Screven LA; Dent ML
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0197774. PubMed ID: 29874248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination of communication vocalizations by single neurons and groups of neurons in the auditory midbrain.
    Schneider DM; Woolley SM
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3248-65. PubMed ID: 20357062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GABA
    Gourévitch B; Mahrt EJ; Bakay W; Elde C; Portfors CV
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Jan; 123(1):134-148. PubMed ID: 31721644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Mouse Inferior Colliculus Responds Preferentially to Non-Ultrasonic Vocalizations.
    Tehrani M; Shanbhag S; Huyck JJ; Patel R; Kazimierski D; Wenstrup JJ
    eNeuro; 2024 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38514192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of Ultrasonic Vocalizations by Socially Housed and Isolated Mice.
    Screven LA; Dent ML
    eNeuro; 2019; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 31570420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of partial from whole ultrasonic vocalizations using a go/no-go task in mice.
    Holfoth DP; Neilans EG; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3401. PubMed ID: 25480084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasonic Vocalizations of Male Mice Differ among Species and Females Show Assortative Preferences for Male Calls.
    Musolf K; Meindl S; Larsen AL; Kalcounis-Rueppell MC; Penn DJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134123. PubMed ID: 26309246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social isolation produces no effect on ultrasonic vocalization production in adult female CBA/CaJ mice.
    Screven LA; Dent ML
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213068. PubMed ID: 30835741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Overrepresentation of High Frequencies in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus Supports the Processing of Ultrasonic Vocalizations.
    Garcia-Lazaro JA; Shepard KN; Miranda JA; Liu RC; Lesica NA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133251. PubMed ID: 26244986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial organization of receptive fields in the auditory midbrain of awake mouse.
    Portfors CV; Mayko ZM; Jonson K; Cha GF; Roberts PD
    Neuroscience; 2011 Oct; 193():429-39. PubMed ID: 21807069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.
    Souffi S; Lorenzi C; Varnet L; Huetz C; Edeline JM
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jul; 40(27):5228-5246. PubMed ID: 32444386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps by mice.
    Screven LA; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1481. PubMed ID: 27914389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.