These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24417344)
1. Integrated assessment of risk and sustainability in the context of regulatory decision making. Sexton K; Linder SH Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(3):1409-18. PubMed ID: 24417344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using health impact assessment to integrate environmental justice into federal environmental regulatory analysis. Yuen TK; Payne-Sturges DC New Solut; 2013; 23(3):439-66. PubMed ID: 24551949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using health impact assessment to integrate environmental justice into federal environmental regulatory analysis. Yuen TK; Payne-Sturges DC New Solut; 2013 Jan; 23(3):1-28. PubMed ID: 23945351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. Gasparatos A J Environ Manage; 2010 Aug; 91(8):1613-22. PubMed ID: 20413212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk characterization: A bridge to informed decision making. North DW Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1997 Oct; 39(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 9344620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A look at state-level risk assessment in the United States: making decisions in the absence of federal risk values. Effio DG; Kroner O; Maier A; Hayes W; Willis A; Strawson J Risk Anal; 2013 Jan; 33(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 22650987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When Are Adverse Outcome Pathways and Associated Assays "Fit for Purpose" for Regulatory Decision-Making and Management of Chemicals? Coady K; Browne P; Embry M; Hill T; Leinala E; Steeger T; Maślankiewicz L; Hutchinson T Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):633-647. PubMed ID: 30908812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Science-policy in environmental and health risk assessment: if we cannot do without, can we do better? Ricci PF; Cox LA; MacDonald TR Hum Exp Toxicol; 2006 Jan; 25(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 16459712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations. Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Policy decision-making under scientific uncertainty: radiological risk assessment and the role of expert advisory groups. Mossman KL Health Phys; 2009 Aug; 97(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19590269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primer for evaluating ecological risk at petroleum release sites. Claff R Drug Chem Toxicol; 1999 Feb; 22(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 10189585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehensive environmental assessment: a meta-assessment approach. Powers CM; Dana G; Gillespie P; Gwinn MR; Hendren CO; Long TC; Wang A; Davis JM Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9202-8. PubMed ID: 22889372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary: EPA's proposed expansion of dose-response analysis is a positive step towards improving its ecological risk assessment. Agathokleous E; Anav A; Araminiene V; De Marco A; Domingos M; Kitao M; Koike T; Manning WJ; Paoletti E; Saitanis CJ; Sicard P; Vitale M; Wang W; Calabrese EJ Environ Pollut; 2019 Mar; 246():566-570. PubMed ID: 30594897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A blueprint for the problem formulation phase of EPA-type ecological risk assessments for 316(b) determinations. Van Winkle W; Dey WP; Jinks SM; Bevlhimer MS; Coutant CC ScientificWorldJournal; 2002 Jun; 2 Suppl 1():271-98. PubMed ID: 12805899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward sustainability: a case study demonstrating transdisciplinary learning through the selection and use of indicators in a decision-making process. Stahl C; Cimorelli A; Mazzarella C; Jenkins B Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2011 Jul; 7(3):483-98. PubMed ID: 21309078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making. Rudén C; Adams J; Ågerstrand M; Brock TC; Poulsen V; Schlekat CE; Wheeler JR; Henry TR Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 27599457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity characterizations: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study. Beck NB; Becker RA; Erraguntla N; Farland WH; Grant RL; Gray G; Kirman C; LaKind JS; Jeffrey Lewis R; Nance P; Pottenger LH; Santos SL; Shirley S; Simon T; Dourson ML Environ Int; 2016; 89-90():110-28. PubMed ID: 26827183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating susceptibility into environmental policy: an analysis of the national ambient air quality standard for lead. Chari R; Burke TA; White RH; Fox MA Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2012 Apr; 9(4):1077-96. PubMed ID: 22690184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's activities to prepare for regulatory and risk assessment applications of genomics information. Benson WH; Gallagher K; McClintock JT Environ Mol Mutagen; 2007 Jun; 48(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 17567849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]