These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. A three-appointment alternative treatment protocol for fabricating an implant-supported milled bar overdenture. Lin WS; Ozdemir E; Morton D J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 22304740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impression technique for ovate pontics. de Vasconcellos DK; Volpato CÂ; Zani IM; Bottino MA J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles. Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Technique for making flexible impression trays for the microstomic patient. Whitsitt JA; Battle LW J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):608-9. PubMed ID: 6389845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A practical three visit complete denture system. Ling BC Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2000 Oct; 15():66-8. PubMed ID: 11709981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression]. Biffar R; Bittner B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fabrication of a custom impression tray using a thermoplastic material as the tray spacer. Barrero C; Purdy M J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 16198183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with microstomia. Prithviraj DR; Ramaswamy S; Romesh S Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):483-6. PubMed ID: 20139576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Microstomia: entry made easy in no entry (with sectional tray and sectional denture). Patel A; Sethuraman R; Prajapati P; Patel JR BMJ Case Rep; 2013 Jul; 2013():. PubMed ID: 23843416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system. Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A simplified impression technique for dental implants. Vogel RE Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A three-visit, complete-denture technique utilizing visible light-cured resin for tray and base plate construction. Ling BC Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15119715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray. Hsu YT J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Visual observation of the dynamic flow of elastomer rubber impression material between the impression tray and oral mucosa while seating the impression tray. Nishigawa G; Natsuaki N; Maruo Y; Okamoto M; Minagi S J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12787458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]