277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24417584)
1. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of responsive insertion technology (RIT) on reducing discomfort during colonoscopy: randomized clinical trial.
Pasternak A; Szura M; Solecki R; Matyja M; Szczepanik A; Matyja A
Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2247-2254. PubMed ID: 27631316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical impact of endoscopy position detecting unit (UPD-3) for a non-sedated colonoscopy.
Fukuzawa M; Uematsu J; Kono S; Suzuki S; Sato T; Yagi N; Tsuji Y; Yagi K; Kusano C; Gotoda T; Kawai T; Moriyasu F
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(16):4903-10. PubMed ID: 25945003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.
Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Fujii H; Tanaka N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1936-40. PubMed ID: 15447752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial.
Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; Brotons A; Sáez J; Girona E; Pérez E; Picó MD; Grau C; Sillero C
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jul; 23(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 21593674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients.
Yoshikawa I; Honda H; Nagata K; Kanda K; Yamasaki T; Kume K; Tabaru A; Otsuki M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Dec; 97(12):3052-5. PubMed ID: 12492189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study.
Park CH; Lee WS; Joo YE; Kim HS; Choi SK; Rew JS; Kim SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2504-10. PubMed ID: 17090280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.
Dafnis GM
Endoscopy; 2000 May; 32(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 10817176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.
Rex DK
Endoscopy; 2001 Jan; 33(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 11204989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.
Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy.
Coppola F; Gaia S; Cosimato M; Recchia S
Dig Liver Dis; 2011 Jun; 43(6):475-7. PubMed ID: 21334994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.
Shumaker DA; Zaman A; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Feb; 55(2):172-9. PubMed ID: 11818918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colonoscope with a sub-distal hyper-flaccid segment for improved insertion at colonoscopy: a randomized study.
Hoff G; Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ludolph T; Huppertz-Hauss G; Paulsen J; Seip B; Sauar J; Kjellevold Ø; Chengarov L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 20923378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
