These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24418267)

  • 1. Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting: quantification of the inherent trade-off.
    Ottersen T; Mæstad O; Norheim OF
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2014 Jan; 12(1):2. PubMed ID: 24418267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting.
    Ottersen T
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 39(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 23204320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism.
    Herlitz A
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 44(2):109-113. PubMed ID: 28993423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making use of equity sensitive QALYs: a case study on identifying the worse off across diseases.
    Lindemark F; Norheim OF; Johansson KA
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2014; 12():16. PubMed ID: 25089121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pandemic prioritarianism.
    Nielsen L
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Apr; 48(4):236-239. PubMed ID: 33542106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution-Weighted Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Lifetime Health Loss.
    Hernæs UJV; Johansson KA; Ottersen T; Norheim OF
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):965-974. PubMed ID: 28625004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the influence of gestalt-type characteristics on preferences over lifetime health profiles.
    Oliver A
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 18378938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competing Principles for Allocating Health Care Resources.
    Carter D; Gordon J; Watt AM
    J Med Philos; 2016 Oct; 41(5):558-83. PubMed ID: 27473407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the role of cost-effectiveness thresholds in healthcare priority setting.
    Siverskog J; Henriksson M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2021 Jan; 37():e23. PubMed ID: 33491617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.
    Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated current health time-trade-off assessments in women's health.
    Tosteson AN; Kneeland TS; Nease RF; Sumner W
    Value Health; 2002; 5(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 11918825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
    Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Principles of Need and the Aggregation Thesis.
    Gustavsson E; Juth N
    Health Care Anal; 2019 Jun; 27(2):77-92. PubMed ID: 28866792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding quality-adjusted life years and their application to pharmacoeconomic research.
    Raisch DW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2000; 34(7-8):906-14. PubMed ID: 10928403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health, priority to the worse off, and time.
    Herlitz A
    Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Dec; 21(4):517-527. PubMed ID: 29350341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. E-learning and health inequality aversion: A questionnaire experiment.
    Cookson R; Ali S; Tsuchiya A; Asaria M
    Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1754-1771. PubMed ID: 30033581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is a larger patient benefit always better in healthcare priority setting?
    Sandman L; Liliemark J; Gustavsson E; Henriksson M
    Med Health Care Philos; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38822945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.
    Fox M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Dean J; Stein K; Price A; Taylor RS
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. PubMed ID: 17999842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the U.S. healthcare setting?
    Zamora B; Garrison LP; Unuigbe A; Towse A
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2021 Mar; 19(1):13. PubMed ID: 33648523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.