These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24419501)
1. Notes From the Field: Direct Observation Versus Rating by Videos for the Assessment of Central Venous Catheterization Skills. Ma IW; Zalunardo N; Brindle ME; Hatala R; McLaughlin K Eval Health Prof; 2015 Sep; 38(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 24419501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation. Ma IW; Zalunardo N; Pachev G; Beran T; Brown M; Hatala R; McLaughlin K Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Oct; 17(4):457-70. PubMed ID: 21877217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective comparison of live and video-based assessments of colonoscopy performance. Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Carnahan H; Yu JJ; Yong E; Nguyen GC; Ling SC; Khanna N; Walsh CM Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Mar; 87(3):766-775. PubMed ID: 28859953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosing technical competence in six bedside procedures: comparing checklists and a global rating scale in the assessment of resident performance. Walzak A; Bacchus M; Schaefer JP; Zarnke K; Glow J; Brass C; McLaughlin K; Ma IW Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1100-8. PubMed ID: 25881644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving internal medicine residents' performance, knowledge, and confidence in central venous catheterization using simulators. Millington SJ; Wong RY; Kassen BO; Roberts JM; Ma IW J Hosp Med; 2009 Sep; 4(7):410-6. PubMed ID: 19753575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of Google Glass and traditional video vantage points for bedside procedural skill assessment. Evans HL; O'Shea DJ; Morris AE; Keys KA; Wright AS; Schaad DC; Ilgen JS Am J Surg; 2016 Feb; 211(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 26679825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Picking the Right Tool for the Job: A Reliability Study of 4 Assessment Tools for Central Venous Catheter Insertion. Lord JA; Zuege DJ; Mackay MP; des Ordons AR; Lockyer J J Grad Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 11(4):422-429. PubMed ID: 31440337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Nickel F; Hendrie JD; Stock C; Salama M; Preukschas AA; Senft JD; Kowalewski KF; Wagner M; Kenngott HG; Linke GR; Fischer L; Müller-Stich BP Eur Surg Res; 2016; 57(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 27058392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can skills coaches be used to assess resident performance in the skills laboratory? Rooney DM; Hungness ES; Darosa DA; Pugh CM Surgery; 2012 Jun; 151(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 22652120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing a Tool to Assess Placement of Central Venous Catheters in Pediatrics Patients. Fleming GM; Mink RB; Hornik C; Emke AR; Green ML; Mason K; Petrillo T; Schuette J; Tcharmtchi MH; Winkler M; Turner DA J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 8(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 27413436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Part versus whole: a randomized trial of central venous catheterization education. Chan A; Singh S; Dubrowski A; Pratt DD; Zalunardo N; Nair P; McLaughlin K; Ma IW Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 Oct; 20(4):1061-71. PubMed ID: 25638697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The development of an independent rater system to assess residents' competence in invasive procedures. Evans LV; Morse JL; Hamann CJ; Osborne M; Lin Z; D'Onofrio G Acad Med; 2009 Aug; 84(8):1135-43. PubMed ID: 19638785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a cast application simulator and evaluation of objective measures of performance. Moktar J; Popkin CA; Howard A; Murnaghan ML J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e76. PubMed ID: 24806022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring operative performance after laparoscopic skills training: edited videotape versus direct observation. Scott DJ; Rege RV; Bergen PC; Guo WA; Laycock R; Tesfay ST; Valentine RJ; Jones DB J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2000 Aug; 10(4):183-90. PubMed ID: 10997840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing instrument handling and operative consequences simultaneously: a simple method for creating synced multicamera videos for endosurgical or microsurgical skills assessments. Jabbour N; Sidman J Simul Healthc; 2011 Oct; 6(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 21527869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy: direct observation of polypectomy skills. Gupta S; Anderson J; Bhandari P; McKaig B; Rupert P; Rembacken B; Riley S; Rutter M; Valori R; Vance M; van der Vleuten CP; Saunders BP; Thomas-Gibson S Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1232-9.e2. PubMed ID: 21628015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Video recordings can be used for easier and faster evaluations of the performances of postgraduate trainees]. Rosholm JU; Konge L; Tulupova E; Hertel NT; Matzen LE Ugeskr Laeger; 2013 Jun; 175(23):1646-8. PubMed ID: 23731993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery. Lou X; Lee R; Feins RH; Enter D; Hicks GL; Verrier ED; Fann JI J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):2491-6.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25308119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Procedural competence in internal medicine residents: validity of a central venous catheter insertion assessment instrument. Huang GC; Newman LR; Schwartzstein RM; Clardy PF; Feller-Kopman D; Irish JT; Smith CC Acad Med; 2009 Aug; 84(8):1127-34. PubMed ID: 19638784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]