These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24421053)

  • 1. A comparison of Bayesian adaptive randomization and multi-stage designs for multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wason JM; Trippa L
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2206-21. PubMed ID: 24421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of multi-arm multi-stage design and adaptive randomization in platform clinical trials.
    Lin J; Bunn V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Mar; 54():48-59. PubMed ID: 28089763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) randomised selection designs: impact of treatment selection rules on the operating characteristics.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Blenkinsop A; Handley K; Pinkney T; Parmar MKB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):124. PubMed ID: 38831421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian decision-theoretic sequential response-adaptive randomization design.
    Jiang F; Jack Lee J; Müller P
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):1975-94. PubMed ID: 23315678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation study of outcome adaptive randomization in multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wathen JK; Thall PF
    Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):432-440. PubMed ID: 28982263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
    Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages of multi-arm non-randomised sequentially allocated cohort designs for Phase II oncology trials.
    Mossop H; Grayling MJ; Gallagher FA; Welsh SJ; Stewart GD; Wason JMS
    Br J Cancer; 2022 Feb; 126(2):204-210. PubMed ID: 34750494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical controversies in clinical research: scientific and ethical problems with adaptive randomization in comparative clinical trials.
    Thall P; Fox P; Wathen J
    Ann Oncol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1621-8. PubMed ID: 25979922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian adaptive designs for multi-arm trials: an orthopaedic case study.
    Ryan EG; Lamb SE; Williamson E; Gates S
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):83. PubMed ID: 31937341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design for binary outcomes with application to tuberculosis.
    Bratton DJ; Phillips PP; Parmar MK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Nov; 13():139. PubMed ID: 24229079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.
    Richert L; Doussau A; Lelièvre JD; Arnold V; Rieux V; Bouakane A; Lévy Y; Chêne G; Thiébaut R;
    Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24571662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Bayesian adaptive designs to improve phase III trials: a respiratory care example.
    Ryan EG; Bruce J; Metcalfe AJ; Stallard N; Lamb SE; Viele K; Young D; Gates S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 May; 19(1):99. PubMed ID: 31088354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian adaptive randomization designs for targeted agent development.
    Lee JJ; Xuemin Gu ; Suyu Liu
    Clin Trials; 2010 Oct; 7(5):584-96. PubMed ID: 20571130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian adaptive randomized trial design for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
    Trippa L; Lee EQ; Wen PY; Batchelor TT; Cloughesy T; Parmigiani G; Alexander BM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(26):3258-63. PubMed ID: 22649140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical aspects of the TNK-S2B trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: an efficient, dose-adaptive, seamless phase II/III design.
    Levin B; Thompson JL; Chakraborty B; Levy G; MacArthur R; Haley EC
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 21737464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of methodological considerations regarding adaptive stopping, arm dropping, and randomization in clinical trials.
    Granholm A; Kaas-Hansen BS; Lange T; Schjørring OL; Andersen LW; Perner A; Jensen AKG; Møller MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 153():45-54. PubMed ID: 36400262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design considerations for Factorial Adaptive Multi-Arm Multi-Stage (FAST) clinical trials.
    Beall J; Elm J; Semler MW; Wang L; Rice T; Kamel H; Mack W; Mistry AM
    Trials; 2024 Sep; 25(1):608. PubMed ID: 39261887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BASIC: A Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design for phase II clinical trials.
    Jiang L; Thall PF; Yan F; Kopetz S; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2023 Oct; 20(5):486-496. PubMed ID: 37313712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian response-adaptive trial in tuberculosis: The endTB trial.
    Cellamare M; Ventz S; Baudin E; Mitnick CD; Trippa L
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 27559021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.