These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24421961)

  • 21. Ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates: is there a safe limit for acceptable image quality?
    Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Oct; 52(7):20230174. PubMed ID: 37493608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spectral optimization for micro-CT.
    Hupfer M; Nowak T; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3229-39. PubMed ID: 22755706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 8421741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.
    Kaeppler G; Vogel A; Axmann-Krcmar D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 11114666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can Digital Enhancement Restore the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate-Based Radiographs Partially Damaged by Ambient Light?
    Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Barros-Costa M; Oliveira ML
    J Imaging Inform Med; 2024 Feb; 37(1):145-150. PubMed ID: 38343236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of simulated periodontal defects using cone-beam CT and digital intraoral radiography.
    Bayat S; Talaeipour AR; Sarlati F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Jul; 45(6):20160030. PubMed ID: 27115722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems.
    Scaf G; Sakakura CE; Kalil PF; Dearo de Morais JA; Loffredo LC; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 17082333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study.
    Gijbels F; Bou Serhal C; Willems G; Bosmans H; Sanderink G; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 11313730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone.
    Mol A; Balasundaram A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 18757716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss.
    Henriksson CH; Stermer EM; Aass AM; Sandvik L; Møystad A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008; 66(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 18932094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement accuracy and perceived quality of imaging systems for the evaluation of periodontal structures.
    Baksi BG
    Odontology; 2008 Jul; 96(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 18661206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurements of simulated periodontal bone defects in inverted digital image and film-based radiograph: an in vitro study.
    de Molon RS; Morais-Camillo JA; Sakakura CE; Ferreira MG; Loffredo LC; Scaf G
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Dec; 42(4):243-7. PubMed ID: 23301211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital radiographic image-based bone level measurements: effect of film density.
    Shrout MK; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Ahmed NM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Sep; 20(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 8408722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Dental application of imaging information. Evaluation of optimum tube voltages].
    Kitahara K
    Nichidai Koko Kagaku; 1989 Jun; 15(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 2626168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dual-beam imaging for online verification of radiotherapy field placement.
    Jaffray DA; Chawla K; Yu C; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1273-80. PubMed ID: 7493852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study.
    Kuwahara C; Aoki T; Oda N; Kawabata J; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi M; Fujii M; Korogi Y
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.