These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24421961)

  • 41. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
    Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Relationship between Radiation Quality and Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography: Validation Study Using Human Soft Tissue-equivalent Phantom].
    Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(3):255-262. PubMed ID: 33746173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of VistaScan image enhancement filters on diagnosis of simulated periapical lesions on intraoral radiographs.
    Brasil DM; Yamasaki MC; Santaella GM; Guido MCZ; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180146. PubMed ID: 30260235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Effect of tube voltage on digital chest radiograph for phantom and occupational exposed workers].
    Wang XH; Liu DS; Xuan X; Kang H; Duan JH; Yuan HS
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 31(9):671-4. PubMed ID: 24064123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
    Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems-part 2: a subjective assessment.
    Marinho-Vieira LE; Martins LAC; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Apr; 52(4):20220370. PubMed ID: 36988093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.
    Dashpuntsag O; Yoshida M; Kasai R; Maeda N; Hosoki H; Honda E
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5215413. PubMed ID: 28497053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology.
    Huda W; Rill LN; Benn DK; Pettigrew JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Jun; 83(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 9195631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Bou Serhal C; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 11641728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets.
    Jaffray DA; Drake DG; Moreau M; Martinez AA; Wong JW
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 10524434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How Does Ambient Light Affect the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography? A Quantitative Analysis Using Contemporary Digital Radiographic Systems.
    Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Wanderley VA; Ambrosano GMB; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Determination of optimum exposure parameters for dentoalveolar structures of the jaws using the CB MercuRay system with cluster signal-to-noise analysis.
    Weerawanich W; Shimizu M; Takeshita Y; Okamura K; Yoshida S; Jasa GR; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2019 Sep; 35(3):260-271. PubMed ID: 30484205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Analysis of photostimulable phosphor plate image artifacts in an oral and maxillofacial radiology department.
    Chiu HL; Lin SH; Chen CH; Wang WC; Chen JY; Chen YK; Lin LM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):749-56. PubMed ID: 18547836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of technical conditions of X-ray imaging on reproducibility and precision of digital computer-assisted X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR).
    Malich A; Boettcher J; Pfeil A; Sauner D; Heyne JP; Petrovitch A; Hansch A; Linss W; Kaiser WA
    Skeletal Radiol; 2004 Dec; 33(12):698-703. PubMed ID: 15480639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.