148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24422035)
1. The Effects on Absorbed Dose Distribution in Intraoral X-ray Imaging When Using Tube Voltages of 60 and 70 kV for Bitewing Imaging.
Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2013; 4(3):e2. PubMed ID: 24422035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ambient dose during intraoral radiography with current techniques: part 3: effect of tube voltage.
Hoogeveen RC; van Beest D; Berkhout E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 May; 50(4):20190362. PubMed ID: 33180551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation Exposure and Frequency of Dental, Bitewing and Occlusal Radiographs in Children and Adolescents.
Schüler IM; Hennig CL; Buschek R; Scherbaum R; Jacobs C; Scheithauer M; Mentzel HJ
J Pers Med; 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37109079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing image quality and dose for digital radiography of distal pediatric extremities using the contrast-to-noise ratio.
Hess R; Neitzel U
Rofo; 2012 Jul; 184(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 22618480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study.
Hellén-Halme K
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 20143243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal radiation dose of four tube voltages in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy: A phantom study.
Matsunaga Y; Haba T; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Asada Y; Chida K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 22(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 33449434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Relationship between Radiation Quality and Image Quality in Digital Chest Radiography: Validation Study Using Human Soft Tissue-equivalent Phantom].
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Kunitomo H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(3):255-262. PubMed ID: 33746173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Investigation of beam quality for digital chest radiography with RbBr:Tl(+) photostimulable storage phosphors].
Kawata H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 59(9):1174-82. PubMed ID: 14593331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation in Attenuation in L1 Trabecular Bone at Different Tube Voltages: Caution Is Warranted When Screening for Osteoporosis With the Use of Opportunistic CT.
Garner HW; Paturzo MM; Gaudier G; Pickhardt PJ; Wessell DE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):165-170. PubMed ID: 27762605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization and preliminary imaging evaluation of a clinical prototype stationary intraoral tomosynthesis system.
Inscoe CR; Platin E; Mauriello SM; Broome A; Mol A; Gaalaas LR; Regan Anderson MW; Puett C; Lu J; Zhou O
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5172-5185. PubMed ID: 30259988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of tube potential on periodontal bone level measurements and subjective image quality using a digital photostimulable storage phosphor sensor.
Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R
J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2010; 1(1):e5. PubMed ID: 24421961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations.
Schmidt BT; Hupfer M; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27518213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
